Model Number 97714 |
Device Problems
Failure to Interrogate (1332); Unstable (1667); Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method (2017); Low Battery (2584); Battery Problem (2885); Charging Problem (2892); Communication or Transmission Problem (2896); Connection Problem (2900); Device Markings/Labelling Problem (2911); Material Integrity Problem (2978)
|
Patient Problem
Pain (1994)
|
Event Date 08/16/2016 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Information references the main component of the system and the other components are: product id: 37751, serial# (b)(4), product type: recharger.Product id: 37761, serial# (b)(4), product type: recharger.
|
|
Event Description
|
The patient reported that the implantable neurostimulator (ins) recharger was dead and not charging.The desktop charger seemed ok.Additional information received from the patient indicated they were getting poor communication on the programmer.They were unable to communicate with the recharger and the last successful charging session was 3 months ago.The connector pin was mislabeled and would only plug in backwards.When the patient aligned the arrows, the pin would not fit.It was noted that the patient stated that the devices did not work.A manufacturer representative (rep) met with the patient to address the overdischarge.The rep showed the patient how to do a physician mode recharge (pmr) but the patient could not remember at the time of the report and couldn't charge the ins.The patient was scheduled for an mri that was not related to the ins or therapy.Additional information received from the rep indicated that they suspected that the ins was put in backwards.The patient did 3-4 pmrs and still couldn't communicate with the ins.The antenna locate (al) feature was done and showed 78-79, with 60 on the left.The patient needed imaging due to pain.A flipped ins was not confirmed, but the rep couldn't initiate a charge on (b)(6) 2016.An x-ray was recommended to confirm if the ins was flipped.The pain was chronic back and leg pain, and no new pain diagnosis.There were bent pins on the desktop charger.The ins was indicated for spinal pain.
|
|
Event Description
|
Additional information was received from the rep and it was reported that the ins was not flipped.The rep reported that it was most likely that the patient was not compliant with the trickle charge and never was able to wake the ins as a result.The rep offered to do it in the office for him, but the patient refused.The ins was explanted.No further outcomes were reported.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|