• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ANGIOMED GMBH & CO. MEDIZINTECHNIK KG FLUENCY PLUS ENDOVASCULAR STENT GRAFT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ANGIOMED GMBH & CO. MEDIZINTECHNIK KG FLUENCY PLUS ENDOVASCULAR STENT GRAFT Back to Search Results
Catalog Number FEM12040
Device Problems Positioning Failure (1158); Fracture (1260); Material Perforation (2205)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 08/09/2016
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The device history records are being reviewed.The event is currently under investigation.The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant was unable to provide any further patient details.
 
Event Description
It was reported that during the stent placement procedure for treatment of a stenosis in the subclavian vein distal to the junction of subclavian and brachiocephalic vein via access through a forearm a/v graft, the endovascular stent graft could not be deployed resulting in the breakage of the outer catheter of the delivery system.The device was removed and another stent graft was used to complete the procedure successfully.There was no reported patient injury.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The lot history records have been reviewed with special attention to the manufacturing and inspection of this product and the product was found to have met all specifications prior to shipment.There is no indication for a manufacturing-related failure.The evaluation of the returned device confirmed the reported failure to deploy the stent graft.The delivery system was found to be in used condition upon sample receipt.Two distal stent graft struts were found to have perforated the distal tip of the outer sheath of the delivery system leading to increased release force and subsequent sheath fracture which made successful stent graft deployment impossible.Potential contributing factors to the reported event have been considered.Previous investigations of similar complaints have been reviewed.The reported event may be associated with a difficult vessel anatomy or challenging stent placement site leading to increased friction and subsequent damage to the outer sheath.Reportedly, the target lesion had been pre-dilated.Not using an introducer sheath or the use of an inappropriately sized guide wire also may contribute to the reported event.As reported, difficulties were experienced in inserting the delivery system and resistance was felt during tracking of the system.Insufficient flushing of the device may be another contributing factor to increased friction and subsequent device damage.On the basis of the information available, a definite root cause for the reported event could not be determined.The ifu states: "if unusual resistance or high deployment force is encountered during stent graft deployment, abort the procedure, remove the delivery system and use an alternative device of the same size." and "the safety and effectiveness of the device when placed across a tight bend including the terminal cephalic arch or across the elbow joint has not been evaluated.Prior to stent graft deployment, ensure that the proximal (inflow) stent graft end is positioned in a straight section of the lumen to reduce the risk of higher deployment forces and possible endovascular system failure." the ifu indicates that an introducer sheath with appropriate inner diameter and a 0.035" (0.89 mm) guide wire are required for the procedure.Also the ifu states: "do not kink the delivery catheter or use excessive force during delivery to the target lesion." in addition, the ifu states that the device must be flushed with sterile saline.Updated 'eval code & desc - conclusion 1'; evaluation completed.
 
Event Description
It was reported that during the stent placement procedure for treatment of a stenosis in the subclavian vein distal to the junction of subclavian and brachiocephalic vein via access through a forearm a/v graft, the endovascular stent graft could not be deployed resulting in the breakage of the outer catheter of the delivery system.The device was removed and another stent graft was used to complete the procedure successfully.There was no reported patient injury.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
FLUENCY PLUS ENDOVASCULAR STENT GRAFT
Type of Device
ENDOVASCULAR STENT GRAFT
Manufacturer (Section D)
ANGIOMED GMBH & CO. MEDIZINTECHNIK KG
wachhausstrasse 6
karlsruhe 76227
GM  76227
Manufacturer (Section G)
ANGIOMED GMBH & CO. MEDIZINTECHNIK KG -9681442
wachhausstrasse 6
karlsruhe 76227
GM   76227
Manufacturer Contact
daniela mueller
wachhausstrasse 6
karlsruhe 76227
GM   76227
0497219445
MDR Report Key5980074
MDR Text Key55718703
Report Number9681442-2016-00249
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code PFV
UDI-Device Identifier04049519008639
UDI-Public(01)04049519008639(17)190513(10)ANAS1297
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P130029
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 09/06/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/27/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date05/13/2019
Device Catalogue NumberFEM12040
Device Lot NumberANAS1297
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer09/20/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received10/14/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured06/06/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age57 YR
-
-