• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SYNTHES HAGENDORF STARDRIVE SCREWDRIVER SHAFT T8SELF-RETAINING/QC; APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERVERTEBRAL BODY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SYNTHES HAGENDORF STARDRIVE SCREWDRIVER SHAFT T8SELF-RETAINING/QC; APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERVERTEBRAL BODY Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 03.617.902
Device Problems Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913); Material Deformation (2976)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 09/08/2016
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.Patient weight is not available for reporting.Device is an instrument and is not implanted/explanted.A device history record review was performed for the subject device lot.Manufacturing location: (b)(4).Date of manufacture: mar 13, 2015.The review showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of the product that would contribute to this complaint condition.No non-conformances were generated during the production of the subject device.The subject device has been received and is currently undergoing investigation.The results of the investigation are pending completion.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Event Description
It was reported that during surgery to implant a zero-p device for adjacent level disc disease at c6-c7 issues occurred with two stardrive screwdrivers and a torque limiting attachment during screw insertion.The patient was previously implanted with a competitor's device one level above at c5-c6.The competitor's device remained in place as surgeon added zero-p device to the level below.While the stardrive screwdriver shaft was inside the torque limiting attachment and the torque limiting attachment was inside the standard green handle, the surgeon attempted to back out one of the screws when the stardrive screwdriver shaft began to spin freely and would not engage with the torque limiting attachment.It was noted that the distal tip of the stardrive screwdriver shaft was deformed and stripped.A second stardrive screwdriver shaft was used from the set.Retrieving the second stardrive screwdriver shaft caused a 5-7 minute surgical delay.The stardrive screwdriver shaft properly engaged the torque limiting attachment but would not allow the screw that was backed out to be screwed back down and seated.The stardrive screwdriver shaft became deformed at the distal tip.A third stardrive screwdriver shaft from another set was used.There was no reported breakage or fragments resulting from the tips of the screwdriver shafts becoming deformed.Standard x-rays were taken.The surgeon was able to properly seat the screw and complete the procedure successfully.This report is 1 of 3 for (b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.A product development investigation was performed for the screwdriver shaft t8 (part number 03.617.902, lot number 9404562).The subject device was returned with the complaint condition stating the distal drive tips were stripped.The complaint was able to be confirmed.The screwdriver shaft t8 was evaluated in a static torsional test resulting in the following conclusion: ¿the screwdriver shaft remain in the elastic range up to a torque of between 2nm and 2.2nm.The maximum of the plastic range and hence the maximum torque is achieved on the average after 2.49nm.Then the tip shears off.The tips achieve different maximum rotation angles until rupture occurs.¿ as deformation occurs between 2-2.2nm and failure occurs at approximately 2.49nm, the returned instruments were exposed to a values outside of their intended operating range causing the reported failures.Relevant drawings for the returned instrument were reviewed.The design, materials and finishing processes were found to be appropriate for the intended use of these devices.A device history review was performed for the returned instruments; lot numbers and no mrrs, ncrs or complaint-related issues were identified with the lot numbers which may have contributed to the complaint condition.No definitive root cause was able to be determined; the failure mode is typically associated with rough handling and/or the application of excessive force during screw insertion.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
STARDRIVE SCREWDRIVER SHAFT T8SELF-RETAINING/QC
Type of Device
APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERVERTEBRAL BODY
Manufacturer (Section D)
SYNTHES HAGENDORF
im bifang 6
hagendorf CH461 4
SZ  CH4614
Manufacturer (Section G)
SYNTHES HAGENDORF
im bifang 6
hagendorf CH461 4
SZ   CH4614
Manufacturer Contact
mark vornheder
1302 wrights lane east
west chester, PA 19380
6107195000
MDR Report Key5983510
MDR Text Key55819388
Report Number3003875359-2016-10517
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KWQ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K152239
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 09/08/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/28/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number03.617.902
Device Lot Number9404562
Other Device ID Number(01)10705034717166(10)9404562
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer09/19/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received11/04/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured03/13/2015
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
ONE, UNKNOWN SCREW
Patient Age55 YR
-
-