• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: STRYKER SPINE-FRANCE UNKNOWN_SPINE_PRODUCT; UNKNOWN SPINE PRODUCT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

STRYKER SPINE-FRANCE UNKNOWN_SPINE_PRODUCT; UNKNOWN SPINE PRODUCT Back to Search Results
Catalog Number UNK_SPN
Device Problems Fracture (1260); Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923)
Patient Problems Injury (2348); No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 08/30/2016
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was reported that the surgeon performed an occiput-t2 revision/extension to t3.There was a fractured c1 smooth shank screw (3.5x28mm) in which the tulip head was completely displaced from the shank.During the revision surgery, after gaining access, the surgeon proceeded to remove 18 total blockers from the construct.He verbally noted that multiple blockers were loose upon removal.He then removed both vitallium rods (2 offset connectors included).After removing his rods he had to fish out the screw threading of the c1 smooth shank screw that was fractured.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Risk assessment.The device was not returned and no lot # was provided, so a manufacturing record review could not be performed.Per the surgical technique, "delayed union or nonunion: internal fixation appliances are load sharing devices which are used to obtain alignment until normal healing occurs.In the event that healing is delayed, does not occur, or failure to immobilize the delayed/nonunion results, the implant will be subject to excessive and repeated stresses which can eventually cause loosening, bending or fatigue fracture.The degree or success of union, loads produced by weight bearing, and activity levels will, among other conditions, dictate the longevity of the implant.", the surgical technique also states, "while the expected life of spinal implant components is difficult to estimate, it is finite." as the tulip was also found to have disengaged, this further supports the root cause of loading cycles causing the device failure.The most probable root cause of the failure is additional and repetitive stresses placed on the construct from the lack of fusion.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the surgeon performed an occiput-t2 revision/extension to t3.There was a fractured c1 smooth shank screw (3.5x28mm) in which the tulip head was completely displaced from the shank.During the revision surgery, after gaining access, the surgeon proceeded to remove 18 total blockers from the construct.He verbally noted that multiple blockers were loose upon removal.He then removed both vitallium rods (2 offset connectors included).After removing his rods he had to fish out the screw threading of the c1 smooth shank screw that was fractured.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
UNKNOWN_SPINE_PRODUCT
Type of Device
UNKNOWN SPINE PRODUCT
Manufacturer (Section D)
STRYKER SPINE-FRANCE
zone industrielle de marticot
cestas 33610
FR  33610
Manufacturer (Section G)
STRYKER SPINE-FRANCE
zone industrielle de marticot
cestas 33610
FR   33610
Manufacturer Contact
rakshya bista
2 pearl court
allendale, NJ 07401
2017608000
MDR Report Key5984822
MDR Text Key56333997
Report Number0009617544-2016-00386
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MNI
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 09/02/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/28/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator No Information
Device Catalogue NumberUNK_SPN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received09/02/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age72 YR
Patient Weight64
-
-