A customer reported to biomerieux a misidentification event occurred when using the viteks instrument.The customer reported that the vitek ms instrument returned a result of enterococcus cassilliflavus; however, the neqas proficiency sample should have been enterococcus gallinarum.Since this is a proficiency sample, there was no patient results involved in this event.An investigation has been initiated by biomerieux to investigate this event.
|
A customer reported to biomerieux a misidentification event occurred when using the vitek® ms instrument.An internal biomérieux investigation was performed.Ivd mode - neqas specimen 3250 / distribution 3926 (external quality control) - expected id: enterococcus gallinarum, results obtained by the customer: vitek® 2 result : e.Gallinarum 98%.Api result: 50/50 e.Casseliflavus, e.Gallinarum.Vitek® ms result (labid: 16m4015606, run on 12 and 19jul2016): e.Casseliflavus (99.9% and identification obtained 3 times).Note: only two (2) sample mzml files were provided for investigation: one (1) gave e.Casseliflavus and the other noid.Each isolate was incubated on columbia blood agar (oxoid) for 18-24 hours in co2.One (1) passage was performed before the first run on the vitek® ms, and there were eight (8) passages before the second time the isolate was run.A fresh overnight culture of the organism was used each time.It was noted that the organism did not have a yellow pigment (note: e.Casseliflavus colony is yellow).Each time the isolate was run on the vitek® ms it was applied to the slide in duplicate, as per laboratory protocol.There was no need for re-aquisition or re-deposit as a good result was achieved first time and the e.Coli control passed the calibration both times.Investigation conclusion: the analysis of the data provided (ecal mzml) indicates that the system seems to be operational.Fine-tuning criteria are met.However, several spectra were too noisy, too many peaks, no identification.The sample preparation should be checked at the customer site.Biomérieux r&d department tested the neqas strain internally.The organism was subcultured on cba media, tested on vitek® ms, 16s sequencing, on vitek2, api20strep and rapidid32strep strips.Sequencing 16s: identification to enterococcus gallinarum 100%, so intended neqas result is confirmed.Vitek® ms gave a correct identification to enterococcus gallinarum 99.9% (5/5 spots).Therefore, the customer misidentification was not reproduced.Nevertheless, on vitek® 2 and api strips, we observed an atypical biochemical profile.The most probable root cause of the customer's misidentification is a spot preparation issue.This is the first complaint recorded for this issue (vitek ms e.Casseliflavus instead of e.Gallinarum).
|