• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BIOMERIEUX, INC VITEK® 2 GRAM-POSITIVE IDENTIFICATION TEST KIT; VITEK® 2 GP ID CARD

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BIOMERIEUX, INC VITEK® 2 GRAM-POSITIVE IDENTIFICATION TEST KIT; VITEK® 2 GP ID CARD Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 21342
Device Problem Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings (1535)
Patient Problems No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199); No Patient Involvement (2645)
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Device not returned to manufacturer.
 
Event Description
A customer in ireland contacted biomérieux to report a misidentification of neqas survey organism enterococcus gallinarum as enterococcus casseliflavus in association with the vitek® 2 gram-positive (gp) identification (id) test kit.Repeat test obtained the same result.There is no indication or report from the laboratory that the discrepant result led to any adverse event related to any patient's state of health.There was no patient directly associated with the neqas survey sample.Culture submittal was requested by biomérieux for internal investigation.Biomérieux investigation will be initiated.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
A customer in (b)(6) contacted biomérieux to report a misidentification of (b)(6) survey organism enterococcus gallinarum as enterococcus casseliflavus in association with the vitek® 2 gram-positive (gp) identification (id) test kit.An internal biomérieux investigation was performed.On a (b)(6) survey ((b)(6)), 74% of biologists reported enterococcus gallinarum, on gp card (vitek® 2 software version v7.01): misidentification as enterococcus casseliflavus.The organism was subcultured on cba media and coh media, tested on 16s sequencing, vitek® ms, and on four (4) different lots of vitek® 2 gp cards.The vitek® 2 gp cards tested in-house, gave on 5/8 tests, a low discrimination between enterococcus gallinarum and enterococcus casseliflavus , with one (1) test against cdex for e.Gallinarum.For 3/8 tests (cl2 and cl3), vitek® 2 gp cards gave excellent identification to enterococcus gallinarum (98%).The customer's result was not duplicated: misidentification to enterococcus casseliflavus on vitek® 2, but the low discrimination between these 2 species, e.Gallinarum and e.Casseliflavus, was reproduced.Remark: the cdex test negative is atypical on vitek® 2 and confirmed on rapid id32strep strip.The non-yellow pigmentation of the colony is in favor of e.Gallinarum (complementary test recommended); atypical strain.Per internal testing, the identification to the species e.Gallinarum was well confirmed on sequencing and on vitek® ms.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
VITEK® 2 GRAM-POSITIVE IDENTIFICATION TEST KIT
Type of Device
VITEK® 2 GP ID CARD
Manufacturer (Section D)
BIOMERIEUX, INC
595 anglum road
st. louis MO 63042
Manufacturer (Section G)
BIOMERIEUX, INC
595 anglum road
st. louis MO 63042
Manufacturer Contact
ellen weltmer
595 anglum road
hazelwood, MO 63042
3147317301
MDR Report Key5997438
MDR Text Key56394015
Report Number1950204-2016-00140
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LQL
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeEI
PMA/PMN Number
K952095
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,health professional,u
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 09/06/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received10/04/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date09/30/2017
Device Catalogue Number21342
Device Lot Number242394310
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received09/06/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured03/31/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-