A customer in (b)(6) contacted biomérieux to report a misidentification of (b)(6) survey organism enterococcus gallinarum as enterococcus casseliflavus in association with the vitek® 2 gram-positive (gp) identification (id) test kit.An internal biomérieux investigation was performed.On a (b)(6) survey ((b)(6)), 74% of biologists reported enterococcus gallinarum, on gp card (vitek® 2 software version v7.01): misidentification as enterococcus casseliflavus.The organism was subcultured on cba media and coh media, tested on 16s sequencing, vitek® ms, and on four (4) different lots of vitek® 2 gp cards.The vitek® 2 gp cards tested in-house, gave on 5/8 tests, a low discrimination between enterococcus gallinarum and enterococcus casseliflavus , with one (1) test against cdex for e.Gallinarum.For 3/8 tests (cl2 and cl3), vitek® 2 gp cards gave excellent identification to enterococcus gallinarum (98%).The customer's result was not duplicated: misidentification to enterococcus casseliflavus on vitek® 2, but the low discrimination between these 2 species, e.Gallinarum and e.Casseliflavus, was reproduced.Remark: the cdex test negative is atypical on vitek® 2 and confirmed on rapid id32strep strip.The non-yellow pigmentation of the colony is in favor of e.Gallinarum (complementary test recommended); atypical strain.Per internal testing, the identification to the species e.Gallinarum was well confirmed on sequencing and on vitek® ms.
|