|
Model Number ICF100 |
Device Problem
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
Patient Problem
Aortic Dissection (2491)
|
Event Date 09/13/2016 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Product evaluation was not performed as the device was discarded by the hospital staff.The clinical observation was unable to be confirmed.Manufacturing records were unable to be reviewed as no lot number was provided.A manufacturing deficiency or product deficiency was not identified.Based on the information received, operational context and patient's anatomical condition contributed to this event.The instructions for use (ifu) were reviewed and no inadequacies were identified with regards to warnings, contraindications, and the directions/conditions for the successful use of the device.Injuries to the aorta or artery through which it is inserted are listed as a potential complication in the product ifu.The ifu provides the following warnings: "ensure the guidewire precedes the occlusion device to prevent damage to aortic valve or artery.Failure to advance over a guidewire may result in dissection or perforation of the artery.If a dissection or perforation is detected, do not initiate or continue bypass as it may propagate dissection.Do not advance the occlusion device if resistance is felt.Inability to easily advance the occlusion device may indicate vascular disease or injury." the training material instructs physicians to perform pre-operative tests such as a ct angiography prior to the case to detect vascular complications which are undetected by cardiac catheterization.In case where the presence of certain anatomical conditions exist, femoral arterial perfusion may be contraindicated.The fmea adequately addresses potential causes of failure and the associated hazards.The complaint trend was assessed and was found to be in control.No corrective or preventative actions are required at this time.Trends will continue to be monitored through the use of edwards quality systems and if action is required, appropriate investigation will be performed.
|
|
Event Description
|
Edwards was notified of an aortic dissection that occurred after difficulty placing an intra-aortic occlusion device.The surgeon cannulated the right femoral artery with a cannula with no problem.He then attempted to insert the occlusion device, which would not pass through the patient's ascending aorta.He opted to use an another cannula in the left femoral artery and left the original cannula in the right femoral artery.Echo had been used during guidewire placement, but fluoro was brought in only after encountering difficulty placing the occlusion device.The imaging showed the patient had a very tortuous femoral artery.There were no other anatomical variances.After closing the left atrium following the robotic mvr, the patient developed an aortic dissection.As a result of the dissection, the patient required aortic valve replacement along with replacement of the aortic root and ascending aorta with concomitant right coronary artery bypass grafting.A ct angiogram was not performed prior to the procedure as the patient was transferred form an outside facility.The surgeon believed that there was damage to the intima of the femoral artery when trying to insert the occlusion device.This likely resulted in a tear in the femoral, which extended to the aorta.The patient left the or in stable condition.Subsequently, patient suffered from a parietal lobe stroke.On postoperative day one (1), did not have doppler pulse in the left leg.A ct angiogram showed the patient had dissections of all of his major blood vessels.He became acidotic and expired in the afternoon of post-operative day one due to the dissection caused ischemia to multiple organ systems.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|