• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - COSTA RICA (COYOL) POLARIS¿ ULTRA; STENT, URETERAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - COSTA RICA (COYOL) POLARIS¿ ULTRA; STENT, URETERAL Back to Search Results
Model Number M0061921420
Device Problem Calcified (1077)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 09/12/2016
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(6).The complainant was unable to provide the suspect device lot number; therefore, the lot expiration and device manufacture dates are unknown.However, the complainant reported that the device was not expired (b)(4).The device has not been received for analysis.Upon receipt and completion of the failure analysis of the complaint device, if there is any further relevant information from that review, a supplemental medwatch will be filed.
 
Event Description
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that a polaris ultra ureteral stent that was implanted in (b)(6) 2016, was removed from the ureter during stent withdrawal procedure performed on (b)(6) 2016.According to the complainant, during the scheduled stent removal, it was found that the stent was calcified.Although the stent was found calcified, it was reportedly still be able to drain.There were no patient complications reported as a result of this event.The patient's condition at the conclusion of the procedure was reported to be stable.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
A visual analysis of the returned device has found evidence of calcification on both pigtails and in the middle section of the catheter.The evaluation revealed that the stent was calcified.During manufacturing, devices were inspected to ensure that all finished devices meet specifications.Most likely, the issue could have been generated when the device remains in the patient's body for a certain time.Therefore, the most probable root cause assigned to the complaint is "anticipated procedural complication".
 
Event Description
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that a polaris¿ ultra ureteral stent that was implanted in (b)(6) 2016, was removed from the ureter during stent withdrawal procedure performed on (b)(6) 2016.According to the complainant, during the scheduled stent removal, it was found that the stent was calcified.Although the stent was found calcified, it was reportedly still be able to drain.There were no patient complications reported as a result of this event.The patient's condition at the conclusion of the procedure was reported to be stable.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
POLARIS¿ ULTRA
Type of Device
STENT, URETERAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - COSTA RICA (COYOL)
2546 first street
propark free zone
alajuela
CS 
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - COSTA RICA (COYOL)
2546 first street
propark free zone
alajuela
CS  
Manufacturer Contact
nancy cutino
100 boston scientific way
marlborough, MA 01752
5086834000
MDR Report Key6028806
MDR Text Key57403375
Report Number3005099803-2016-03004
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FAD
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K010002
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 09/19/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Physician
Device Model NumberM0061921420
Device Catalogue Number192-142
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer10/28/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 09/19/2016
Initial Date FDA Received10/13/2016
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received11/29/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age49 YR
-
-