A customer notified biomerieux that they had a mis-identification when using the vitek ms instrument.An internal biomérieux investigation was performed.A blood culture patient isolate was identified on the vitek ms ivd with two (2) different results: streptococcus pneumoniae or streptococcus mitis/oralis.Sample mzml files associated with two (2) accession numbers were provided for investigation: (b)(6).These are from the same patient but different plates.The correct identification should be streptococcus mitis/oralis.Vitek 2 confirmed that accession # (b)(6) is streptococcus mitis/oralis.-fine tuning: samples tested on 13, 14 and (b)(6) 2016, last fine-tuning date : (b)(6) 2016.-culture conditions: blood agar, 35°c at co2, pure colonies.Investigation conclusion: out of the 17 tests performed by the customer on this strain: - 10 gave the correct result s.Mitis/oralis - the system performed as expected - five (5) gave no identification - the system performed as expected giving noid because the spectrum was not optimal - two (2) gave a misidentification s.Pneumoniae.- results for which this investigation was opened.The last fine tuning was done the day before the misidentification occured (fine tuning done on (b)(6) and misidentifications obtained on (b)(6)).The fine-tuning criteria were met on (b)(6) 2016 whereas two (2) criteria (good peak and identification score) were under the target when analyzing the ecal mzml from (b)(6) 2016.It was noticed that the number of "all peaks" is heterogeneous, this could be due to sample preparation issue.In this case, non-optimal quality spectra could be generated and analyzed by the system.Customer's spectra were analyzed.Investigation showed that customer's spectra calibrated manually to suppress this defect gave the correct identification str.Mitis/oralis instead of misidentifications.Note that the risk associated with this software defect has been assessed to minor for vitek ms v2 and has already been corrected with vitek ms v3.Moreover, the customer's strain was tested internally on vitek ms v2 (version used by the customer) and vitek ms v3 (next system version), results are : - v2: 2 correct identifications and one (1) low discrimination including s.Mitis/oralis - v3: 2 correct identifications and one (1) noid.The misidentification obtained by the customer was not reproduced internally.The customer's misidentification is most likely caused by sample preparation issue.
|