• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: W.L. GORE & ASSOCIATES GORE VIABAHN® ENDOPROSTHESIS; STENT, SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

W.L. GORE & ASSOCIATES GORE VIABAHN® ENDOPROSTHESIS; STENT, SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY Back to Search Results
Catalog Number PAC060502
Device Problems Detachment Of Device Component (1104); Positioning Failure (1158)
Patient Problem Aneurysm (1708)
Event Date 09/27/2016
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
A review of the manufacturing records for the device verified that the lot met all pre-release specifications.(b)(4).Our engineers have evaluated the returned device.Their investigation showed following: the deployment knob was pulled 22.7cm away from the hub.A kink was noted at the transition of the delivery catheter.The outer braided constraining line and 0.5cm of the inner braided constraining line were deployed.One half centimeter of the tip/distal end of the endoprosthesis was expanded.Traction on the deployment line resulted in further deployment of the device during the evaluation.Based on the device examination performed, no manufacturing anomalies were identified.Based on the observation from the engineer from october 24, 2016, the reportability for this medical device incident was reassessed and discrepancy regarding provided event description wand investigation results was documented.
 
Event Description
On an unknown date the patient was treated with a fenestrated aortic prosthesis to treat an abdominal aortic aneurysm.Both renal arteries, the superior mesenteric artery and the celiac trunk (left gastric and splenic artery) were treated with bare metal stents which were connected to the aortic prosthesis.During a patients follow up procedure it was recognized, that all five implanted bare metal stents were disconnected from the aortic prosthesis.Therefore the decision was made to implant five gore® viabahn® endoprostheses to bridge the region between the disconnected bare metal stents and the aortic prosthesis.It was reported to gore that when device deployment of one gore® viabahn® endoprosthesis, on an unknown artery, was initiated the device did not deploy at all.The decision was made to remove the medical device through the introducer sheath and the procedure was completed implanting another gore® viabahn® endoprosthesis.The patient did not experienced any serious injury due to the deployment failure.It was stated that the other four gore® viabahn® endoprosthesis were successfully implanted and that the physician was satisfied with the outcome.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
GORE VIABAHN® ENDOPROSTHESIS
Type of Device
STENT, SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY
Manufacturer (Section D)
W.L. GORE & ASSOCIATES
flagstaff AZ
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDICAL ECHO RIDGE B/P
3250 w. kiltie lane
flagstaff AZ 86005
Manufacturer Contact
barbara ulrich
1500 n. 4th street
flagstaff, AZ 
9285263030
MDR Report Key6056533
MDR Text Key58815535
Report Number2017233-2016-00825
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NIP
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeGM
PMA/PMN Number
P040037
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 10/24/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date09/27/2018
Device Catalogue NumberPAC060502
Device Lot Number14523827
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer10/18/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received Not provided
Initial Date FDA Received10/26/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured09/28/2015
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Age79 YR
-
-