Model Number IGK0010-40 |
Device Problem
Manufacturing, Packaging or Shipping Problem (2975)
|
Patient Problem
Blood Loss (2597)
|
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The (10/3317/213) a review of the device history records, including collagen coating records, indicated that the graft was processed and inspected according to procedures and no anomaly was found.Specifically, the review of the water permeability testing records of products coated on the same day and under the same conditions as the complaint device indicated values well within product specifications.The (3340/3345/213) one retention sample coated on the same period and under the same conditions as the complaint device underwent water permeability testing at 120mmhg as per iso 7198.The test result indicated a value well within product specifications.The investigation is still on-going.A follow-up report will be sent upon completion of the investigation.
|
|
Event Description
|
During a cardiac surgery, it was reported a diffuse and strong bleeding from the graft wall, through all length, after implantation.The bleeding could not be stopped.The graft was explanted and another one was implanted.No additional information could be obtained at the date of this report.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
A piece of the graft was returned for examination.It was sent to an external and independent laboratory, it should be noted that this fragment was stored in a surgical glove from the date of the surgery until it was sent to the laboratory for examination.The objective of the study was to evaluate the presence of any structural abnormality visible on the external side of the returned fragment and to evaluate the presence of collagen material.The analysis consisted of a macroscopic observation of the fragment and a scanning electron microscopy (sem).The sem analysis pointed out a massive and heterogeneous collagen material infiltration through the textile structure.The heterogeneous pattern of the collagen (disrupted collagen material) was likely related to the poor storage conditions of the prosthesis before receipt at the laboratory for analysis.No significant abnormality such as tears, loss of textile cohesion, holes and signs of cut were observed.The sem analysis corroborated the macroscopic analysis.No conclusion can be drawn.However, all available information and the product testing performed would tend to indicate that the device was not defective.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|