Catalog Number SGC0101 |
Device Problem
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
Patient Problem
Atrial Perforation (2511)
|
Event Date 10/05/2016 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).During processing of this complaint, attempts were made to obtain complete event, patient and device information.The customer reported the steerable guide catheter was discarded.Investigation is not yet complete.A follow up report will be submitted with all additional relevant information.
|
|
Event Description
|
This is filed to report the atrial-septal defect (asd) requiring intervention.It was reported that this was a mitraclip procedure to treat functional mitral regurgitation (mr) with a grade of 4.Two clips were implanted and the mr was reduced to <1.While retracting the steerable guiding catheter (sgc) into the right atrium, a right-left shunt was observed.The oxygen saturation (spo2) remained at 95-98% during the procedure, but after checking a blood sample from the left atrium, the spo2 and atrial saturation (pao2) were at 93%.The atrial pressure was 92mmhg.The decision was made to implant an atrial septal occluder.Although no septal tear was observed, it was concluded that the shunt was due to the tricuspid regurgitation, creating a high right atrium pressure.The occluder was implanted and the asd was treated successfully.The spo2 and pao2 recovered to 98% soon after the implantation.The patient remained stable throughout the procedure.No additional information was provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).The device was not returned for analysis.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no similar incidents reported from this lot.The reported patient effect of atrial perforation (atrial septal defect), as listed in the mitraclip system instructions for use, is a known possible complication associated with mitraclip procedures.Based on the information reviewed, the reported patient effect of atrial perforation appears to be related to patient conditions as per the account there was no septal tear observed and it was concluded that the shunt was due to the pre-existing tricuspid regurgitation and high right atrium pressure.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design or labeling.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|