• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COOK INC FILIFORM DOUBLE PIGTAIL URETERAL STENT SET; FAD STENT, URETERAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COOK INC FILIFORM DOUBLE PIGTAIL URETERAL STENT SET; FAD STENT, URETERAL Back to Search Results
Model Number N/A
Device Problem Break (1069)
Patient Problem No Code Available (3191)
Event Date 09/29/2016
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).The event is currently under investigation.
 
Event Description
It was reported on (b)(6) 2016 a stent was implanted during a ureteroscopy lithotripsy for a patient who had ureteral calculus.Upon scheduled removal of the stent on (b)(6) 2016 by ureteroscope the physician noted the stent was broken inside the patient at the location of 25 cm and 13 cm.Additional procedure was performed on (b)(6) 2016 by ureteroscope and the detached portion of the stent was successfully removed.A section of the device did not remain inside the patient's body.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).A review of the complaint history, device history record and quality control was conducted during the investigation.The complaint device was not returned therefore, no physical examinations could be performed; however, a document based investigation evaluation was performed.There is no evidence to suggest the product was not made to specifications.Review of device history record shows no nonconforming events which could contribute to this failure mode.It should be noted there were no other reported complaints for this lot number.Based on the information provided, no product returned and the results of our investigation, a definitive root cause could not be determined; however it is possible that user technique and/or patient physiology contributed to this event.We will continue to monitor for similar complaints.Per the quality engineering risk assessment no further action is required.
 
Event Description
It was reported on (b)(6) 2016 a stent was implanted during a ureteroscopy lithotripsy for a patient who had ureteral calculus.Upon scheduled removal of the stent on (b)(6) 2016 by ureteroscope the physician noted the stent was broken inside the patient at the location of 25cm and 13cm.Additional procedure was performed on (b)(6) 2016 by ureteroscope and the detached portion of the stent was successfully removed.A section of the device did not remain inside the patient¿s body.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
FILIFORM DOUBLE PIGTAIL URETERAL STENT SET
Type of Device
FAD STENT, URETERAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
COOK INC
750 daniels way
bloomington IN 47404
Manufacturer Contact
rita harden
750 daniels way
bloomington, IN 47404
8123392235
MDR Report Key6061510
MDR Text Key58537881
Report Number1820334-2016-01108
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FAD
UDI-Device Identifier00827002151468
UDI-Public(01)00827002151468(17)190331(10)6856766
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCN
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type distributor,foreign
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 09/29/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberN/A
Device Catalogue Number133626
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 09/29/2016
Initial Date FDA Received10/27/2016
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received12/20/2016
Date Device Manufactured03/31/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age59 YR
-
-