• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ATRICURE INC. COBRA FUSION 150 ABLATION SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ATRICURE INC. COBRA FUSION 150 ABLATION SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Model Number 700-001S
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Death (1802)
Event Date 10/03/2016
Event Type  Death  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4) the device was not returned to atricure for evaluation as it was discarded by facility.
 
Event Description
During a deep-style surgical procedure, the surgeon gained access from the right side of the chest.It was noted that there was fat on the pericardium that was taken off prior to opening the pericardium.Once inside, it was noticed that there were more adhesions than usual and probably due to the multiple endocardial ablations that were performed in the past.Once typical dissection was achieved, dissector was inserted and clamp was placed around right sided pv's.Pv isolation was achieved and confirmed with the max5 pen.At that point, magnetic introducers were inserted and fusion 150 ablation device was pulled in place.Care was taken to make sure the device was below the appendage and nowhere near the circumflex artery.Ten-thousand (10,000) units of heparin was administered and tee probe was pulled back.The fusion device was run for 2 full rounds of bipolar and monopolar at 65c ( 8 minutes per usual).The fusion 150 ablation device was pulled out and the magnets were left in for retrieval on the left side.Mlp1 was utilized to strengthen the points at roof and floor where the fusion line meets up to the pv isolation from the eml2.At that point, a blake drain was inserted and lung brought up, incisions closed and access gained on left side.Magnets retrieved, fusion device hooked up and placed again, 5000 units of heparin was administered and another 8 minute run was performed at 65c.Fusion device and magnets were taken out and mid1 was used to get the eml placed around the pv's.Veins were isolated and confirmed with max5.Mlp1 was used to strengthen the ablation lines at roof/floor/pv junctions and it was also used to ablate from the pv isolation line up onto the laa.A pro235 was inserted and placed on the laa and tee concluded that the appendage was closed.Blake drain inserted and patient converted to nsr.At some point during or directly after procedure, patient suffered a stroke.Patient woke very groggy and had no function of left sided limbs.Magnetic introducer system was left in place on purpose for positioning purposes.Patient expired due to complications of the stroke that was suffered at some point during the procedure or directly after the procedure.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
COBRA FUSION 150 ABLATION SYSTEM
Type of Device
COBRA FUSION 150 ABLATION SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
ATRICURE INC.
7555 innovation way
mason OH 45040
Manufacturer Contact
ranjana iyer
7555 innovation way
mason, OH 45040
5137555328
MDR Report Key6067352
MDR Text Key58769609
Report Number3003502395-2016-00147
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code OCL
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K113475
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 10/03/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received10/31/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number700-001S
Device Catalogue Number700-001S
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received10/03/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
EML2; MAX5; MID1; MLP1; PRO235
Patient Outcome(s) Death;
Patient Age65 YR
Patient Weight113
-
-