A male patient had a 3m(tm) universal electrosurgical pad applied prior to an unspecified surgery.When the pad was removed, the hospital staff noticed a small area of redness which was alleged to be a burn.The severity of the alleged burn was mild.Medical treatment was not specified.3m implemented a recall on selected lots and products as a result of a previous reported adverse event involving same product and lot number.Customer reported this adverse event as a result of our recall.The hospital had not reported the event because the severity was mild (small redness) but due to the recall they reported this event since it included the same lot number and catalog number that was part of the recall.Product used was not returned to 3m.The process liner over the conductive adhesive was noted as random within the lot used and applicable to this report.Without the product it is not possible to confirm product did or did not contain the process liner.
|