Model Number 97714 |
Device Problems
Labelling, Instructions for Use or Training Problem (1318); Therapy Delivered to Incorrect Body Area (1508); Malposition of Device (2616); Inadequate Instructions for Non-Healthcare Professional (2956)
|
Patient Problems
Undesired Nerve Stimulation (1980); Pain (1994); Discomfort (2330); Complaint, Ill-Defined (2331); Numbness (2415)
|
Event Date 04/25/2016 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
A patient reported they had experienced pain since implant and had consulted with their healthcare provider and manufacturer representatives multiple times for adjustments.The patient also reported that she was very uncomfortable with the placement of the implantable neurostimulator (ins), not only in the thoracic area, but the patient could not wear a bra or back brace and could not have any thing touch the ins implant area.The patient states she can't lay flat on her back due to the placement of the ins.The patient states also that the ins extends out, you can see it and touch it and it is very uncomfortable for the patient.The patient further reported they were provided with external equipment and a packet of information with no instructions and that they were under anesthesia when the instructions were provided.The patient was redirected to their healthcare provider.The indication for implant was spinal pain.
|
|
Event Description
|
Additional information was received from the healthcare provider indicating that the patients device will be explanted on (b)(6) 2016.It was reported that the patients stimulator gave them some coverage, but they have pain around their ribs and towards their breast area.Even when the stimulator is not on, the patient feels irritation.Re-programming was attempted with no success.The patient continued to have significant rib stimulation, intermittent abdominal pain, and some thoracic radicular pain.It was also noted that the patient had some numbness along with their rib discomfort on the right side.There was also some pinching at the battery site, and thoracic root irritation.It was mentioned that the patients implant subsequently required multi-level laminectomies to place the paddle, and it is likely that some of the patients pain is from the dissection of the surgery.The patient was not satisfied with their coverage from their stimulator.The patient has requested to have the device removed in hopes of alleviating their thoracic discomfort.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Event Description
|
Additional information was received from the patient.It was reported that the patient's ins was explanted in (b)(6) 2016 because "it was touching the dura." the patient mentioned that they had had complications since the device was implanted.The patient stated that it feels like "something is still in there." the patient reported that they haven't been able to wear a bra or lift their arms since the ins was removed and that there was a "bulge." no further complications are anticipated.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|