Catalog Number 111140 |
Device Problems
Break (1069); Detachment Of Device Component (1104); Crack (1135); Fracture (1260); Insufficient Information (3190)
|
Patient Problems
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199); No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
Event Date 10/12/2016 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
A supplemental report will be submitted upon completion of the investigation.
|
|
Event Description
|
The doctor used the slap hammer to remove the trial the threaded tip broke off in the trial.The threaded tip is stuck in the trial and has not been able to be removed.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Device not returned.An event regarding crack/fracture involving a femoral trial slaphammer was reported.The event was not confirmed.Method & results: -device evaluation and results: a visual, functional and dimensional inspection could not be performed as the device was not returned.-medical records received and evaluation: not performed as patient factors did not contribute to the event.-device history review: device history review indicated the devices accepted into final stock from the reported lot were free from discrepancies -complaint history review: there has been no other event for the lot referenced.Conclusions: the event could not be confirmed nor the root cause determined because the devices were not returned for evaluation and insufficient information was provided.If the devices and/or additional information are received, this investigation will be reopened and re-evaluated.Not available.
|
|
Event Description
|
The doctor used the slap hammer to remove the trial the threaded tip broke off in the trial.The threaded tip is stuck in the trial and has not been able to be removed.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Additional information added to age or date of birth.An event regarding damage involving a femoral trial slaphammer was reported.The event was confirmed.Method & results: device evaluation and results: the device was returned in used condition.The tip of the slap hammer broke off and remained inside the femoral trial.Examination of the returned device with material analysis engineer indicated that the device fracture consistent with an overload condition.Medical records received and evaluation: not performed as patient factors did not contribute to the event.Device history review: device history review indicated the devices accepted into final stock from the reported lot were free from discrepancies complaint history review: no other events were reported for the lot indicated.Conclusions: the investigation concluded that the device fractured due to an overload condition.Examination of the returned device with material analysis engineer indicated that the device fracture consistent with an overload condition.
|
|
Event Description
|
The doctor used the slap hammer to remove the trial the threaded tip broke off in the trial.The threaded tip is stuck in the trial and has not been able to be removed.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|