• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: REVISION OPTICS RAINDROP NEAR VISION INLAY; CORNEAL INLAY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

REVISION OPTICS RAINDROP NEAR VISION INLAY; CORNEAL INLAY Back to Search Results
Model Number 610-0001
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Corneal Edema (1791); Intraocular Pressure Increased (1937); Visual Impairment (2138)
Event Date 10/06/2016
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The explanted inlay was returned to the manufacturer and evaluated and subjected to visual microscopic inspection.The findings revealed that a portion of the inlay edge was torn off and some debris was observed on the inlay, presumably the sebaceous debris as reported by the customer.The torn condition of the inlay is consistent with findings for inlays that have been explanted.The device history record (dhr) for this manufacturing lot was reviewed and the device met all release criteria and there were no discrepancies or unusual findings that relate to the reported event.It is unknown if the first inlay potentially contributed to the events following implantation of the replacement corneal inlay, therefore an mdr is being filed for both devices.Corneal edema, decreased visual acuity, inlay shifts in position, intraocular pressure rise, and inlay removal are listed in the device labeling as known complications of corneal inlay surgery.Complaint reference number: (b)(4).Reference mdr #3005956347-2016-00004 (for the replacement corneal inlay).Date emdr submitted to fda: 11/9/2016.
 
Event Description
Corneal inlay implantation was performed on (b)(6) 2016 on the patient's right eye.At the one-day postoperative visit, the patient presented with some sebaceous interface debris.At the one-week postoperative visit on (b)(6) 2016, debris was graded as 1+ and the patient's best corrected distance visual acuity (bcdva) remained unchanged at 20/20 (compared to the baseline).At this visit the corneal flap was irrigated, which required replacement of the corneal inlay.There was no reported problem with the initial or replacement inlay.Patient follow-up information was received on october 11, 2016, indicating that on (b)(6) 2016 the patient had presented with corneal edema, an inferior shift in inlay position, elevated iop (40 mmhg), and a significant decrease in bcdva (20/150 as compared to 20/20 at baseline).At this visit, the replacement inlay was explanted and no new inlay was implanted.Additional information has been requested.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The patient's increased iop from the steroid response was suspected as triggering the reported event.(b)(4).Reference mdr #3005956347-2016-00004 (for the replacement corneal inlay).Date esmdr submitted: 12/29/2016.
 
Event Description
The surgeon provided the following additional information.The patient's preoperative intraocular pressure (iop) was 16 mmhg.The patient was a steroid responder and the increased pressure to 40 mmhg (as reported in the initial report) caused corneal edema, which caused the inlay to shift position.The patient's current best corrected distance visual acuity (bcdva) improved from 20/150 to 20/20 and iop decreased to 22 mmhg.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
RAINDROP NEAR VISION INLAY
Type of Device
CORNEAL INLAY
Manufacturer (Section D)
REVISION OPTICS
25651 atlantic ocean dr.,
ste. a1
lake forest CA 92630 8835
Manufacturer (Section G)
REVISION OPTICS
25651 atlantic ocean dr.,
ste. a1
lake forest CA 92630 8835
Manufacturer Contact
pushpita singh
25651 atlantic ocean dr.,
ste. a1
lake forest, CA 92630-8835
9497072740
MDR Report Key6094025
MDR Text Key59717273
Report Number3005956347-2016-00005
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LQE
UDI-Device Identifier10850394006013
UDI-Public(01)10850394006013(17)190801(10)002968
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P150034
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional,user faci
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 10/11/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date08/01/2019
Device Model Number610-0001
Device Catalogue NumberRD1-1
Device Lot Number002968
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer09/21/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 10/11/2016
Initial Date FDA Received11/10/2016
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received12/29/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/01/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
FEMTOSECOND LASER FOR CREATION OF CORNEAL FLAP
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age49 YR
-
-