The patient was hospitalized and the physician decided to try the device reset procedure.The device recovered from the eos mode, and both impedance and thresholds in the right and left chambers were fine.A manual capacitor reformation was performed as well.After reset, the device measured a battery life of 89 percent.At some point after (b)(6) 2016, this device was explanted and returned for analysis.The date of explant is unknown.The device was received and analyzed.Prior to the analysis of the device, the available ram dump data were inspected.The inspection confirmed that the device activated the eos status on 29-oct-2016.The available iegms from 29-oct-2016 (episode 145) showed external interfering signals in the rv and farfield channel.The frequency and morphology of the sensed interfering signals as well as the eos detection can be attributed to strong external electromagnetic fields, likely due to the reported mri scan.The inspection of the memory content of the icd showed that the device was reset on 31-oct-2016, as mentioned in the complaint description.Afterwards the battery status was mos1.At a next step the device was subjected to an electrical analysis.The device interrogation confirmed the battery status mos1.An amount of 10 charging cycles was documented.A sensing test was performed and the device sensed the attached heart signals free of noise.The icd was subjected to an electrical analysis.The ability of the device to deliver therapies was verified.The anti-bradycardia pacing pulses proved to be normal and in amplitude and frequency as programmed.A fibrillation signal was applied and the device delivered a defibrillation shock as specified, documenting a correct sensing and shock delivery.In particular, the specified energy level was reached.In conclusion, the device proved to be fully functional.The observed device behavior was most probably caused by a strong external magmatic field during the magnetic resonance imaging.As reported, the mri mode of the icd was not activated at that time.There was no indication of a material or manufacturing problem.
|