• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: OLYMPUS WINTER & IBE GMBH GRASPING FORCEPS, OPTICAL, F. LITHOTRIPSY,

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

OLYMPUS WINTER & IBE GMBH GRASPING FORCEPS, OPTICAL, F. LITHOTRIPSY, Back to Search Results
Model Number A20710A
Device Problem Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913)
Patient Problems Hemorrhage/Bleeding (1888); Injury (2348)
Event Date 10/31/2016
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The device was returned to olympus for evaluation.The grasping forceps was received with the jaws open and unable to close.There was no foreign material noted at the distal end of the device.The grasping forceps was received with both the inner sheath (a22040a) and the outer sheath (a22026a) attached.Mechanical testing was performed by manipulating the handle and noted looseness in the pulled and pushed motion.The jaws were unable to correspond due to the looseness of the handle.It is possible that the jaws guide wire is detached or broken.Visual inspection noted a screw on the black body of the locking cone was tampered with as there are indentations on the screw.The cause for the reported event cannot be determined at this time.The device will be sent to the oem for further investigation.
 
Event Description
Olympus was informed that during an unspecified therapeutic procedure, the patient sustained an intraoperative injury as the forcep was removed in an open position.The surgeon observed bleeding and utilized cautery to treat the site.It was reported that while attempting to retrieve a stone the forcep became locked in an open position.The forcep was replaced and the intended procedure was completed.The patient was admitted to the hospital overnight for observation and was then discharged home.Additionally, it was reported that the patient returned to the facility for a routine post operative visit and is doing well.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The oem's investigation confirmed that the grasping forceps are damaged and defective.A combination tests revealed that the forceps (a20710a) can, with opened/jammed jaws, be safely removed from the instrument combination ¿ consisting of resection sheath, outer sheath, with or without the adaptor, and also a cystoscope sheath.In this way, a safe change of instruments was also guaranteed for jammed forceps¿ jaws whilst the outer sheath or cystoscope sheath remained in the patient¿s body.The welded connection between the transmission-wire guide and the transmission wire, which functions as an overload protector, ruptured in order to prevent fracture of the hinge pin or similar damage to the forceps¿ jaws.The overload protector was properly activated as a consequence of intensive use combined with very high gripping forces.This can be detected by the indentations in the clevis slots.On the underside of the moveable jaw part, and in the connecting region of the transmission wire¿s hinge pin, clear traces of the application of mechanical force can be detected.The nature of this damage indicates that the jammed forceps was removed from the resection sheath or the cystoscope sheath using considerable force.With reference to the available information and photos, it may be concluded that the white insulation beak broke during the attempt to remove the jammed forceps from the resection sheath.The potential hazard for patients, which originated from this damage, could have probably been avoided if the resection sheath together with the jammed forceps had been removed together from the outer sheath.A potential safety risk for the patient can be eliminated since the forceps¿ overload protector was properly activated in order to prevent fracture to the hinge pin or similar damage in the forceps¿ jaws.The requirement, as formulated in the product standard ¿no parts are to fall into the body¿, is met with the function of the welded connection between the transmission-wire guide and the transmission wire as an overload protector.The optical forceps a20710a are not designed to crush large stones but rather as grasping forceps.To crush stones, the bladder stone forceps are available.As a consequence of inappropriate use, e.G.Crushing bladder stones by applying considerable forces, it is possible that following activation of the overload protector, the forceps¿ jaws becomes jammed open and cannot be completely closed.In addition, a material or quality problem can be excluded as a manufacturing and quality control review was performed for the affected lot number 164w-0024 of the a20710a grasping forceps without showing any abnormalities related to function and safety.The root cause is attributed to applied excessive force / mechanical overload.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
GRASPING FORCEPS, OPTICAL, F. LITHOTRIPSY,
Type of Device
GRASPING FORCEPS
Manufacturer (Section D)
OLYMPUS WINTER & IBE GMBH
kuehnstrasse 61
hamburg, hamburg
Manufacturer Contact
connie tubera
2400 ringwood avenue
san jose, CA 95131
408935-512
MDR Report Key6122644
MDR Text Key60745037
Report Number2951238-2016-00882
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code GCP
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
PK790071
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional,user faci
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 03/21/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberA20710A
Device Lot Number34W-0002
Other Device ID Number04042761019989
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer11/15/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 10/31/2016
Initial Date FDA Received11/22/2016
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received03/21/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
A20710A, LOT# 164W-0024; A22040A, LOT# 34W-0076
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
-
-