Olympus was informed that during an unspecified therapeutic procedure, the patient sustained an intraoperative injury as the forcep was removed in an open position.The surgeon observed bleeding and utilized cautery to treat the site.It was reported that while attempting to retrieve a stone the forcep became locked in an open position.The forcep was replaced and the intended procedure was completed.The patient was admitted to the hospital overnight for observation and was then discharged home.Additionally, it was reported that the patient returned to the facility for a routine post operative visit and is doing well.
|
The oem's investigation confirmed that the grasping forceps are damaged and defective.A combination tests revealed that the forceps (a20710a) can, with opened/jammed jaws, be safely removed from the instrument combination ¿ consisting of resection sheath, outer sheath, with or without the adaptor, and also a cystoscope sheath.In this way, a safe change of instruments was also guaranteed for jammed forceps¿ jaws whilst the outer sheath or cystoscope sheath remained in the patient¿s body.The welded connection between the transmission-wire guide and the transmission wire, which functions as an overload protector, ruptured in order to prevent fracture of the hinge pin or similar damage to the forceps¿ jaws.The overload protector was properly activated as a consequence of intensive use combined with very high gripping forces.This can be detected by the indentations in the clevis slots.On the underside of the moveable jaw part, and in the connecting region of the transmission wire¿s hinge pin, clear traces of the application of mechanical force can be detected.The nature of this damage indicates that the jammed forceps was removed from the resection sheath or the cystoscope sheath using considerable force.With reference to the available information and photos, it may be concluded that the white insulation beak broke during the attempt to remove the jammed forceps from the resection sheath.The potential hazard for patients, which originated from this damage, could have probably been avoided if the resection sheath together with the jammed forceps had been removed together from the outer sheath.A potential safety risk for the patient can be eliminated since the forceps¿ overload protector was properly activated in order to prevent fracture to the hinge pin or similar damage in the forceps¿ jaws.The requirement, as formulated in the product standard ¿no parts are to fall into the body¿, is met with the function of the welded connection between the transmission-wire guide and the transmission wire as an overload protector.The optical forceps a20710a are not designed to crush large stones but rather as grasping forceps.To crush stones, the bladder stone forceps are available.As a consequence of inappropriate use, e.G.Crushing bladder stones by applying considerable forces, it is possible that following activation of the overload protector, the forceps¿ jaws becomes jammed open and cannot be completely closed.In addition, a material or quality problem can be excluded as a manufacturing and quality control review was performed for the affected lot number 164w-0024 of the a20710a grasping forceps without showing any abnormalities related to function and safety.The root cause is attributed to applied excessive force / mechanical overload.
|