• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION FREESTYLE AORTIC ROOT BIOPROSTHESIS; HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION FREESTYLE AORTIC ROOT BIOPROSTHESIS; HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE Back to Search Results
Model Number 995
Device Problem Gradient Increase (1270)
Patient Problems Wound Dehiscence (1154); Non specific EKG/ECG Changes (1817); Endocarditis (1834); Hemorrhage, Cerebral (1889); Hemostasis (1895); Unspecified Infection (1930); Myocardial Infarction (1969); Pulmonary Regurgitation (2023); Pulmonary Valve Stenosis (2024); Renal Failure (2041); Respiratory Failure (2484); Complete Heart Block (2627); Thromboembolism (2654)
Event Date 02/17/2016
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Citation: cheul lee article title: outcomes of redo pulmonary valve replacement for bioprosthetic pulmonary valve failure in 61 patients with congenital heart disease european journal of cardio-thoracic surgery 2016: 50(3):470-5; 10.1093/ejcts/ezw037 earliest date of publish used for event date.No unique device identifier serial numbers were provided; without this information it could not be determined whether these observations have been previously reported.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Medtronic received information via literature regarding the outcomes of redo pulmonary valve replacement (pvr) for bioprosthetic pulmonary valve failure in patients with congenital heart disease all data were collected from a single center between november 1999 and june 2013.The study population included 61 patients predominantly male; mean age at initial pvr was 7.0 years and the median age at redo pvr was 13.5 years, 17 of the 61 were implanted with medtronic freestyle and 14 were implanted with a medtronic hancock ii (serial numbers not provided).Among all patients, adverse events included: redo operation due to pulmonary stenosis, pulmonary regurgitation and infective endocarditis resulting in high gradients.Also reported were stroke, myocardial infarction, renal failure, respiratory complications, sternotomy wound problems (infection and superficial dehiscence), bleeding and postoperative arrhythmia's (1 permanent pacemaker for complete heart block (chb).Multiple manufacturers were noted in the literature; based on the available information a direct correlation could not be made between the observed adverse events and medtronic product.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
FREESTYLE AORTIC ROOT BIOPROSTHESIS
Type of Device
HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION
1851 e deere ave
santa ana CA 92705
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION
1851 e deere ave
santa ana CA 92705
Manufacturer Contact
paula bixby
8200 coral sea street ne
mounds view, MN 55112
7635055378
MDR Report Key6132774
MDR Text Key61084309
Report Number2025587-2016-01873
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LWR
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeKS
PMA/PMN Number
P970031
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,health professional,l
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 11/17/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received11/29/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number995
Device Catalogue Number995
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received11/17/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age13 YR
Patient Weight47
-
-