• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MAKO SURGICAL CORP. 3.0 RIO® ROBOTIC ARM - MICS; STEREOTACTIC DEVICE, ROBOTICS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MAKO SURGICAL CORP. 3.0 RIO® ROBOTIC ARM - MICS; STEREOTACTIC DEVICE, ROBOTICS Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 209999
Device Problems Device Displays Incorrect Message (2591); Connection Problem (2900)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 11/23/2016
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
As part of normal complaint follow-up, an evaluation of the event has been initiated by mako surgical.A supplemental report will be submitted when additional information becomes available.
 
Event Description
Prior to a total hip arthroplasty procedure, the mics handpiece was very warm and was giving a temperature error when checking mics status check (due to it having to be one-trayed).After allowing the mics to cool longer about 25 minutes we rechecked the mics status check and got a green code.After opening the tha software a burr status mismatch call service error code occurred.The surgeon completed the case manually.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Reported event: an event regarding a connection error involving 3.0 rio robotic arm - mics, catalog: 209999 was reported.Method & results: device history review: a review of the dhr associated with rio (b)(4) found quality inspection procedures successfully passed.Complaint history: based on the device identification (pn 209999), the complaint databases were reviewed from 2011 to present for similar reported events regarding a connection error.There were two other reported events, (b)(4).Conclusion: an analysis of the vplogs and crisis logs was performed.The logs show that an issue with the cable connection and anspach commutation board prevented both cutting systems in tha and pka cases, respectively, from enabling as indicated by the cable connection error and anspach commutation error.Gsp (b)(4) states, "could not duplicate reported issue.Successfully performed mics status check on both mics handpieces.Successfully performed cutter test on both mics handpieced.The second mics tested had a loud squealing noise but passed.Recommended to mps to replace it.Successfully performed presurgery checks.System is ready for clinical use".
 
Event Description
Prior to a total hip arthroplasty procedure, the mics handpiece was very warm and was giving a temperature error when checking mics status check (due to it having to be one-trayed).After allowing the mics to cool longer about 25 minutes we rechecked the mics status check and got a green code.After opening the tha software a burr status mismatch call service error code occurred.The surgeon completed the case manually.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
3.0 RIO® ROBOTIC ARM - MICS
Type of Device
STEREOTACTIC DEVICE, ROBOTICS
Manufacturer (Section D)
MAKO SURGICAL CORP.
2555 davie road
fort lauderdale FL 33317
Manufacturer (Section G)
MAKO SURGICAL CORP.
2555 davie road
fort lauderdale FL 33317
Manufacturer Contact
michael mcavenia
2555 davie road
fort lauderdale, FL 33317
9546280700
MDR Report Key6145945
MDR Text Key61465077
Report Number3005985723-2016-00411
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code OLO
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K141989
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 02/13/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number209999
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 11/23/2016
Initial Date FDA Received12/05/2016
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received02/13/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization;
-
-