|
Catalog Number AR-1978S-1 |
Device Problems
Break (1069); Detachment Of Device Component (1104)
|
Patient Problem
Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque (3165)
|
Event Date 11/14/2016 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Patient demographics (age at time of event, date of birth, gender, weight) were requested but not provided.No further patient information was provided at the time of this report or made available in response to follow-up communication.No additional adverse consequences have been reported from this event.This device is used for treatment.The device was requested for evaluation but was not returned therefore the complainant's event could not be verified.The cause of the event could not be determined from the information available and without device evaluation.Device history record review revealed nothing relevant to this event.The complainant's event is typically caused by applying leverage force resulting in improper alignment that is not co-axial with the guide setup.This is the first complaint of this type for this part/lot combination.The potential cause(s) of this event will be communicated to the event reporter.If additional relevant information is received, a follow-up report will be submitted.Device requested but not yet received.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that two 40mm transfix pins failed during surgery.On both, head broke off when striking pin into the hole.Surgeon used a 50mm pin instead.Surgery was successfully finished with the new pin.One pin will be returned for evaluation.Update 25-nov-2016: it was reported that a fragment of the pin remained in the bone.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Patient demographics (age at time of event, date of birth, gender, weight) were requested but not provided.No further patient information was provided at the time of this report or made available in response to follow-up communication.No additional adverse consequences have been reported from this event.This device is used for treatment.This is a follow-up submission to reflect device evaluation.Complaint confirmed.The evaluation revealed the implant has sheared in half and cracked at the interface with the impactor.The second piece of the broken implant was not returned for evaluation.The deformed fracture site most likely due to the device being implanted after fracture occurred.The diameter of the device exceeds print specifications; however, this is an expected outcome of the implantation process.The longitudinal crack propagation's asymmetrical shape on the proximal end of the implant is most likely caused by the prepared hole, the implant, and the loading on the implant not being coaxial to one another.Based on the geometry of the fracture, the implant broke at the external edge of the bone, which is consistent with non-axially loading of the implant.The complainant's event is typically caused by not implanting the device coaxially to the prepared hole, prying/leveraging during implantation, or improper bone preparation.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that two 40mm transfix pins failed during surgery.On both, head broke off when striking pin into the hole.Surgeon used a 50mm pin instead.Surgery was successfully finished with the new pin.One pin will be returned for evaluation.Update 25-nov-2016: it was reported that a fragment of the pin remained in the bone.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|