• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION FREESTYLE AORTIC ROOT BIOPROSTHESIS; HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION FREESTYLE AORTIC ROOT BIOPROSTHESIS; HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE Back to Search Results
Model Number FR995
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Aortic Regurgitation (1716); Ventricular Tachycardia (2132); Pseudoaneurysm (2605)
Event Date 11/27/2016
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Product analysis: the device is undergoing an evaluation but has not yet been completed.Conclusion: upon conclusion of the product analysis and investigation, a supplemental report will be submitted.
 
Event Description
Medtronic received information that 1 year and 11 months post implant of this aortic bioprosthetic valve, echocardiogram revealed severe central regurgitation and enlarging false aneurysms.The patient sustained ventricular tachycardia requiring defibrillation, was moved to the cardiac intensive care unit, had a second episode, and was successfully resuscitated with no neurological deficit.Immediately following, this valve was emergently explanted and replaced.No other adverse patient effects were reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Product analysis: the device was received in a blood tainted solution in a specimen container enclosed in a small bio hazard bag in an explant kit.The valve appeared to have been modified with the non-coronary and left cusp buttons cut out.The aortic wall appeared slightly dilated.There appeared to be two visible areas of ruptures consistent for a pseudoaneurysm adjacent to two sinuses of valsalva.The edges appeared rolled and smooth suggesting an adventitial hemorrhage.Both holes or cut-outs on the two sinuses appeared slightly large.Minor stress marks were noted on the intima where the edges appeared rolled.All leaflets were stiff but slightly flexible except where host tissue extended on the outflow of the right cusp.All leaflets were intact.All commissures were intact.A thin layer tan thrombotic appearing host tissue lined the left cusp along the outflow margin of attachment.Radiography showed no evidence of mineralization in the valve.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Conclusion: a visual examination of the device was performed upon receipt.The aortic wall appeared slightly dilated.There appeared to be two visible areas of ruptures adjacent to two sinus of valsalva (non-coronary sinus and left coronary sinus).Both ¿holes or cut outs¿ on the two sinuses appeared slightly large.Minor stress marks were noted on the intima where the edges appeared rolled.All leaflets and commissures were intact.The analysis also confirmed a layer of tan thrombotic host tissue lined on the left cusp along the outflow margin of attachment.The device history record was reviewed and showed that this product met all manufacturing specifications for product released for distribution.No issues were identified that would have impacted this event.In addition to returned product analysis, the valve was sent to histopathology.The histopathological evaluation showed there was fibrous host tissue (pannus) on the non-coronary rolled edge and left coronary sinus that caused a change in shape of those segments.There was also minimal to mild fibrin along the outflow surface of all leaflets.Minimal host inflammatory cell infiltration, adjacent host tissue, right cusp and left cusp leaflets.Based on the received information, histopathological evaluation, and the returned product analysis, the reported regurgitation likely due to the pseudoaneurysm.The definitive cause of the pseudoaneurysm cannot be determined.It has been confirmed that no infection was found.However, it cannot be ruled out whether there are any underlying inflammation responses at play for the cause.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
FREESTYLE AORTIC ROOT BIOPROSTHESIS
Type of Device
HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION
1851 e deere ave
santa ana CA 92705
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION
1851 e deere ave
santa ana CA 92705
Manufacturer Contact
paula bixby
8200 coral sea street ne
mounds view, MN 55112
7635055378
MDR Report Key6172073
MDR Text Key62311842
Report Number2025587-2016-02018
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LWR
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P970031
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 06/13/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date11/05/2019
Device Model NumberFR995
Device Catalogue NumberFR995-29
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer11/30/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 11/29/2016
Initial Date FDA Received12/13/2016
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Not provided
Not provided
06/13/2017
Supplement Dates FDA Received01/02/2017
05/08/2017
06/14/2017
09/27/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured11/24/2014
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age51 YR
-
-