• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ZIMMER TMT TM GLENOID 52MM, 46MM ART

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ZIMMER TMT TM GLENOID 52MM, 46MM ART Back to Search Results
Model Number N/A
Device Problem Loose or Intermittent Connection (1371)
Patient Problem Unspecified Infection (1930)
Event Date 12/05/2016
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation in process.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the patient was presented with an infection.X-rays previous to surgery suggested implant had failed.At surgery it was found poly from glenoid implant had loosened from tm base.It appeared that tm posts were still insitu along with stem and head.Washout performed poly removed.More x-rays to be attended.Patient will require more surgery according to dr (b)(6).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The device was manufactured, inspected and packaged within established process specifications with no anomalies found.The mating humeral head was found to be compatible with the tm glenoid that was implanted.The tm glenoid (keel) did not appear as expected during the engineering review of the x-rays that were provided, rather the tm keel appeared fractured with the disc portion of the tm keel displaced inferiorly.The disc portion of the tm keel is attached to and integral with the poly articular surface of the overall tm glenoid and is therefore an indicator of the poly articular surface location since poly is radiolucent on x-ray.An engineering review of the photographs that were provided for this investigation confirms that the poly articular surface of the tm glenoid had fractured and separated from the tm keel.Tm particulate, albeit unconfirmed since the device was not returned for analysis, is suspected to be embedded in the poly articulating surface.It appears that the tm glenoid was implanted cementless which is an approved method outside of the usa, but again the explanted device was discarded by the hospital and not available for evaluation.Patient is a (b)(6) male, clinically obese but no activity level was reported.No report of a fall was communicated via email follow-up.It was noted however that the patient became non-compliant with follow-up visits with the surgeon.The root cause for the failure of the tm glenoid has not been determined; however, patient weight and non-compliance with follow-up visits with the surgeon may have been contributing factors.This investigation is considered closed at this time; however, should additional information become available, this investigation can be re-opened.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TM GLENOID 52MM, 46MM ART
Type of Device
TM GLENOID
Manufacturer (Section D)
ZIMMER TMT
10 pomeroy road
parsippany NJ 07054
Manufacturer (Section G)
ZIMMER TMT
10 pomeroy road
parsippany NJ 07054
Manufacturer Contact
william hara
10 pomeroy road
parsippany, NJ 07054
9735760032
MDR Report Key6178792
MDR Text Key62545027
Report Number3005751028-2016-00085
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KWT
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeAS
PMA/PMN Number
PK071090
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 03/30/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/15/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date04/30/2018
Device Model NumberN/A
Device Catalogue Number00-4326-052-46
Device Lot Number62352790
Other Device ID NumberN/A
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received12/06/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured05/07/2013
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Removal/Correction NumberN/A
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age64 YR
-
-