MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. INTERSTIM II; STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTABLE, FOR INCONTINENCE
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number 3058 |
Device Problems
Intermittent Continuity (1121); Energy Output To Patient Tissue Incorrect (1209); Therapy Delivered to Incorrect Body Area (1508); Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913); Human-Device Interface Problem (2949)
|
Patient Problems
Undesired Nerve Stimulation (1980); Pain (1994); Tachycardia (2095); Therapeutic Effects, Unexpected (2099); Discomfort (2330)
|
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Concomitant medical products: product id 3889-28, lot# va0l280, implanted: (b)(6) 2014, product type: lead.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Event Description
|
A patient reported she had been having issues since the device was implanted and she did not know if the issues were with the device or where it was implanted.The physician reportedly had a "really hard time" implanting the device.The device had been causing her heart to race which had gotten worse recently.The patient saw her healthcare provider (hcp) who indicated that the issue was not with the device because the device was off.The patient confirmed that she turned the device off herself.However, the patient did not believe the hcp since the device was in the body and she had issues "right from the start".Additionally, the patient had impulses going through her body which started less than 24 hours of being implanted.This was confirmed to be uncomfortable stimulation.Whenever the device "acted up", it hurt the implant site.The patient was not sure if the issue was with her device or her skin.In the last six months, the pulses had become more "extreme" because she still had pulses going down her right leg and "all the way down to her toes" with stimulation off.The pulses could also be in the patient's right or left hand.The patient saw her hcp approximately 6 weeks prior to the report to have her device checked.The hcp reportedly noticed that "one of the leads" was not working right.The hcp set the device on "2" and "all of a sudden", one day the device "started going crazy again".It was noted that at the time of the report the pulses were "pretty much all over the patient's body" and the patient could feel stimulation in her buttock.The device had been off but it was still hurting.It was confirmed that therapy was off.The patient had an appointment scheduled with her hcp the following day.A week later, the patient indicated that the device was going to be explanted because the hcp determined that it was not helping with the patient's symptoms.However, the patient did not agree because the device was helping her, but it was going "crazy", which was reportedly referring to the previously reported issues.The issues were indicated to have gotten worse 2 days prior and "more stuff happened".There were no falls or trauma associated with these issues.The patient was indicated for urinary dysfunction and gastrointestinal/pelvic floor.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|