SORIN GROUP ITALIA S.R.L. - CRM FACILITY PARADYM; DEFIBRILLATOR, AUTO. IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER, WITH CARDIAC RESYNCHRO. (CRT-D)
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number PARADYM CRT-D 8750 |
Device Problem
Pacing Inadequately (1442)
|
Patient Problem
Dyspnea (1816)
|
Event Date 11/24/2016 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
Reportedly, during the scheduled follow-up on (b)(6) 2016, the patient complained from dyspnea during effort since about ten days.Upon interrogation of the subject icd, no acceleration of the cardiac rhythm was recorded in the device memories for the last few days, whereas the rate response was programmed.Reportedly, this behavior has never been observed before.Several tests were performed during the follow-up (parameters reprogramming, tests in real time to try to activate the accelerometer), without any change observed.Preliminary analysis confirmed the reported behavior.Recommendations were provided on (b)(6) 2016 (procedure to attempt to reactivate the accelerometer).Reportedly, recommendations were applied during the follow-up performed on (b)(6) 2016, and rate response associated to the accelerometer sensor was observed again.Next follow-up was reportedly scheduled in (b)(6) 2017.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
During the last interrogation performed on (b)(6) 2017, it was observed that the cardiac rate was constantly at the basic rate since last follow-up on (b)(6) 2016.The accelerometer sensor was back to being unresponsive, therefore the subject icd was replaced on (b)(6) 2017.The icd will be returned for analysis.
|
|
Event Description
|
Reportedly, during the scheduled follow-up on (b)(6) 2016, the patient complained from dyspnea during effort since about ten days.Upon interrogation of the subject icd, no acceleration of the cardiac rhythm was recorded in the device memories for the last few days, whereas the rate response was programmed.Reportedly, this behavior has never been observed before.Several tests were performed during the follow-up (parameters reprogramming, tests in real time to try to activate the accelerometer), without any change observed.Preliminary analysis confirmed the reported behavior.Recommendations were provided on (b)(6) 2016 (procedure to attempt to reactivate the accelerometer).Reportedly, recommendations were applied during the follow-up performed on (b)(6) 2016, and rate response associated to the accelerometer sensor was observed again.Next follow-up was reportedly scheduled in (b)(6) 2017.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Preliminary analysis of the returned device revealed a possible issue on the sensor.
|
|
Event Description
|
Reportedly, during the scheduled follow-up on (b)(6) 2016, the patient complained from dyspnea during effort since about ten days.Upon interrogation of the subject icd, no acceleration of the cardiac rhythm was recorded in the device memories for the last few days, whereas the rate response was programmed.Reportedly, this behavior has never been observed before.Several tests were performed during the follow-up (parameters reprogramming, tests in real time to try to activate the accelerometer), without any change observed.Preliminary analysis confirmed the reported behavior.Recommendations were provided on (b)(6) 2016 (procedure to attempt to reactivate the accelerometer).Reportedly, recommendations were applied during the follow-up performed on (b)(6) 2016, and rate response associated to the accelerometer sensor was observed again.Next follow-up was reportedly scheduled in (b)(6) 2017.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Please refer to the attached investigation report.
|
|
Event Description
|
Reportedly, during the scheduled follow-up on 6 december 2016, the patient complained from dyspnea during effort since about ten days.Upon interrogation of the subject icd, no acceleration of the cardiac rhythm was recorded in the device memories for the last few days, whereas the rate response was programmed.Reportedly, this behavior has never been observed before.Several tests were performed during the follow-up (parameters reprogramming, tests in real time to try to activate the accelerometer), without any change observed.Preliminary analysis confirmed the reported behavior.Recommendations were provided on (b)(6) 2016 (procedure to attempt to reactivate the accelerometer).Reportedly, recommendations were applied during the follow-up performed on 15 december 2016, and rate response associated to the accelerometer sensor was observed again.Next follow-up was reportedly scheduled in january 2017.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|