• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION MOSAIC AORTIC BIOPROSTHETIC HEART VALVE; HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION MOSAIC AORTIC BIOPROSTHETIC HEART VALVE; HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE Back to Search Results
Model Number 305C
Device Problem Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913)
Patient Problem Aortic Valve Stenosis (1717)
Event Date 11/07/2016
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information has been requested, but no new information has been received to date.The device has not been received for analysis.Without the receipt of the product, no definitive conclusion can be made regarding the clinical observation.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Medtronic received information that seventeen days post implant of this aortic bioprosthetic valve, it was explanted and replaced due to stenosis, central regurgitation, and increased gradients.Echocardiogram revealed peak gradients measuring 50mmhg.The etiology of the valvular disease was reported as a congenital abnormality and bicuspid calcification.No other adverse patient effects were reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Analysis: the product was received in a clear 0.2% glutaraldehyde solution in an explant kit.A visual examination of the device was performed upon receipt.The valve appeared distorted, oval shaped, with one of the stent posts significantly bent inward.All leaflets were slightly stiff but flexible.All leaflets appeared intact.All leaflets were in the closed position with a gap between the coaptive ridge of the left cusp and the other two cusps.All commissures were intact.Traces of pannus were observed along the inflow and outflow tracts.A thin layer of pannus was noted on the top of the right non-coronary stent post.An unknown amount of pannus appeared to have been removed on the inflow and outflow.Radiography showed no evidence of mineralization in the valve.The device history record was reviewed and showed that this product met all manufacturing specifications for product released for distribution.No issues were identified that would have impacted this event.Conclusion: based on the received information and the returned product analysis, the valve distortion could have caused the leaflets to be immobile, leading to stenosis and elevated gradients across the valve.This distortion appeared to be consistent with a sizing issue and/or squeezing the stent during implant.Also, distortion of the annular ring and bent stent post can restrict the leaflets from fully opening and cause misalignment of leaflets during valve closure, which may have led to regurgitation.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MOSAIC AORTIC BIOPROSTHETIC HEART VALVE
Type of Device
HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION
1851 e deere ave
santa ana CA 92705
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION
1851 e deere ave
santa ana CA 92705
Manufacturer Contact
paula bixby
8200 coral sea street ne
mounds view, MN 55112
7635055378
MDR Report Key6227842
MDR Text Key64009191
Report Number2025587-2017-00035
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LWR
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeGM
PMA/PMN Number
P990064
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 03/29/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date03/28/2021
Device Model Number305C
Device Catalogue Number305C223
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer01/11/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 12/16/2016
Initial Date FDA Received01/05/2017
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
03/29/2017
Supplement Dates FDA Received03/31/2017
09/28/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured03/29/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age57 YR
-
-