• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CODMAN & SHURTLEFF, INC. / MEDOS S.A. CERTAS INLIN VLV SPHN/UNIT CAT; SHUNT, CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM & COMPS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CODMAN & SHURTLEFF, INC. / MEDOS S.A. CERTAS INLIN VLV SPHN/UNIT CAT; SHUNT, CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM & COMPS Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 82-8806
Device Problems Break (1069); Excess Flow or Over-Infusion (1311); Kinked (1339); Connection Problem (2900)
Patient Problem No Information (3190)
Event Date 12/18/2016
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Upon completion of the investigation a follow up report will be filed.
 
Event Description
On (b)(6) 2016, the l-p shunt surgery was performed and the device was implanted to the patient who was suffering from sah at ilium side.During the surgery, it was noted the catheter at ventral side was kinked, so the surgeon resolved it.The device was kept using.On (b)(6) 2016, it was noted the over drainage and deformation on the valve, so the revision was performed and the device was replaced with another device (product code was unknown).The patient¿s condition is stable.After the revision, when checking the removed device, it was found the valve was broken from the siphon guard and it barely connected to a part of silicon.The surgeon commented that he didn¿t damage the valve though he took the valve off with a pean forceps.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Upon completion of the investigation it was noted that the images were taken of the ¿as received¿ valve.The valve was visually inspected: the silicone housing is cut/torn.The position of the cam when valve was received was at setting 2.The valve was hydrated for 24 hours.The valve was tested for programming.The valve passed the test.The valve was flushed, the valve passed the test no occlusion was noted.The valve was not leak tested, due to the damaged silicone housing.The valve was not reflux tested due to the damaged silicone housing.The siphon guard was not tested due to the damaged silicone housing.The valve was dried.The siphon guard was removed.The valve was then pressure tested, the valve passed the test.Review of the history device records was not possible as the lot number was unknown.The root cause for the over drainage is probably due to the damaged silicone housing, this however could not be determined.The root cause to the tear/cut in the silicone housing is probably being due to the user, this however could not be determined.As noted in the ifu silicone has a low tear / cut resistance.Per hhe, it has been concluded that silicone housing tears are not design related, in order for the housing tear to occur the user has to compromise the silicone through a nick or tear in order for the event to occur.Validation testing demonstrates a robust design.Testing has shown that if the silicone housing has been compromised, a housing tear is likely to occur.Based on the results of this investigation no further action is required.Trends will be monitored for this and similar complaints.At the present time this complaint is closed.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CERTAS INLIN VLV SPHN/UNIT CAT
Type of Device
SHUNT, CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM & COMPS
Manufacturer (Section D)
CODMAN & SHURTLEFF, INC. / MEDOS S.A.
rue girardet 29 case postale
le locle
SZ 
Manufacturer Contact
james kenney
325 paramount drive
raynham, MA 02767
5088282726
MDR Report Key6236536
MDR Text Key64275808
Report Number1226348-2017-10026
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code JXG
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K112156
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Medical Equipment Company Technician/Representative
Type of Report Initial,Followup
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received01/10/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number82-8806
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer01/11/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received01/11/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-