• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SYNTHES USA; PROSTHESIS, RIB REPLACEMENT LAMINATE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SYNTHES USA; PROSTHESIS, RIB REPLACEMENT LAMINATE Back to Search Results
Device Problems Break (1069); Migration or Expulsion of Device (1395)
Patient Problems Failure of Implant (1924); Pain (1994); No Code Available (3191)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Device was used for treatment not diagnosis.Waldhausen, j., redding, g., white, k., song, k.(2016) complications in using the vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib (veptr) in children.Journal of pediatric surgery, vol.51, pp: 1747-1750.This report is for unknown vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib (veptr) system.(other number) udi: unknown part number, udi is unavailable.Investigation could not be completed and no conclusion could be drawn, as no devices were returned and no lot numbers or part numbers were provided.(b)(4).If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Event Description
This report is being filed after the subsequent review of the following journal article: waldhausen, j., redding, g., white, k., song, k.(2016) complications in using the vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib (veptr) in children.Journal of pediatric surgery, vol.51, pp: 1747-1750.This report describes complications using the vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib (veptr, depuy synthes, (b)(4)) for thoracic insufficiency syndrome (tis).Thirty-five (35) patients with veptr i implants and 30 patients with veptr ii implants were included in this study between october 2001 and november 2014.The average age at implantation was 6.9 years (range 1.3¿24.8 years) with an average follow up of 6.9 years (range 0.4¿14.8 years).Twelve children (18.5%) had migration of either the superior cradle hook or the inferior fixation.One of these children (1.5%) had failure of the spinal fixation screws.Two children (3.1%) had migration of the sacral s hook into the pelvis.The other 9 had migration of the superior cradle (13.8%).All of these children either required veptr revision or were at a point in treatment that they underwent veptr removal and final spinal fusion.Three patients had implant fracture, 1 from the veptr itself and 2 from the intramedullary wire placement (4.6%) used in our early patients to provide extra rigidity to the chest wall.Three of the 11 patients who underwent chest wall reconstruction developed persistent pain, 1 from a broken intramedullary wire, 1 from the veptr rubbing on the native rib and 1 from a titanium rib fracture plate dislodging from a rib.This report is for an unknown vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib (veptr) system.This is report 1 of 3 for (b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, RIB REPLACEMENT LAMINATE
Manufacturer (Section D)
SYNTHES USA
1302 wrights lane east
west chester PA 19380
Manufacturer Contact
michael cote
1302 wrights lane east
west chester, PA 19380
6107195000
MDR Report Key6245166
MDR Text Key64597067
Report Number2520274-2017-10120
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MDI
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,litera
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 01/05/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 01/05/2017
Initial Date FDA Received01/12/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-