A customer in the united states had notified biomérieux of misidentification results for a cap survey when testing with vitek® 2 gram positive (gp) test kit; the vitek 2 result was enterococcus casseliflavus three (3) times from three (3) different colonies when the expected organism was enterococcus gallinarum.An internal biomérieux investigation was performed using the internal cap strain isolate.The internal cap reconstituted sample was subcultured and gp testing included individual organism suspensions on two cards from five different lots (including customer lot and random lot).The api 20 strep was also performed; although, it does not identify e.Casseliflavus or e.Gallinarum without supplemental testing.Nine (9) of the 10 gp cards tested resulted in low discrimination calls of e.Casseliflavus/e.Gallinarum.Vitek 2 proposed additional testing to separate these species.The isolate did not demonstrated yellow pigmentation and tested hip positive on the api test kit, resulting in an identification of e.Gallinarum.The remaining card gave an excellent identifications of e.Gallinarum.The vitek 2 gp cards were determined to be performing as expected.
|