• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: LIVANOVA CANADA CORP. MITROFLOW AORTIC PERICARDIAL HEART VALVE - MODEL DL; TISSUE HEART VALVE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

LIVANOVA CANADA CORP. MITROFLOW AORTIC PERICARDIAL HEART VALVE - MODEL DL; TISSUE HEART VALVE Back to Search Results
Model Number DLA
Device Problems Calcified (1077); Material Too Rigid or Stiff (1544)
Patient Problem No Information (3190)
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported that the patient's valve was explanted in 2016 after being implanted for less than 5 years.The device was returned and a gross examination was performed.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Histological exam was sent to livanova on feb 17, 2017: histological analyses were performed on samples taken from leaflets b and c.In leaflets b and c, alizarin red s stain showed the presence of intrinsic calcifications.Pericardial folds were detected on leaflets b and c.In leaflets b and c, hematoxylin and eosin stain showed that the collagen bundles were disrupted and homogenated.The pericardium of leaflet a was slightly thicker than normal.Red blood cells were visible on leaflets b and c.Pericardial delaminations were detected on leaflets b and c.An amorphous tissue was visible inside fibrin deposits that were present on the mediastinic surface of leaflet c.In leaflets b and c, gram stain showed some gram + bacteria.It is possible that the patient¿s clinical history and risk factors may have contributed to the structural valve deterioration observed in this mitroflow valve.However, little clinical history was provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
As reported in the scientific literature, structural dysfunction is the major cause of failure of bioprosthetic heart valves and the principal underlying pathologic process is cuspal calcification.Calcification can also cause stenosis due to cuspal stiffening.Calcific deposits are usually localized to cuspal tissue (intrinsic calcification).Histological analysis identified gram positive bacteria on the pericardium but not inside the pericardium.It is possible that the patient¿s clinical history and risk factors may have contributed to the structural valve deterioration observed in this mitroflow valve.However, little clinical history was provided.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MITROFLOW AORTIC PERICARDIAL HEART VALVE - MODEL DL
Type of Device
TISSUE HEART VALVE
Manufacturer (Section D)
LIVANOVA CANADA CORP.
5005 north fraser way
burnaby, bc
Manufacturer (Section G)
LIVANOVA CANADA CORP.
5005 north fraser way
burnaby, bc
Manufacturer Contact
francesca crovato
5005 north fraser way
burnaby, bc 
4125650
MDR Report Key6268751
MDR Text Key65453059
Report Number3004478276-2016-00191
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LWR
UDI-Device Identifier00896208000160
UDI-Public(01)00896208000160(240)DLA21(17)170531
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P060038
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 05/18/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received01/20/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date05/31/2017
Device Model NumberDLA
Device Catalogue NumberDLA21
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer01/16/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received05/03/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured06/19/2012
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age81 YR
-
-