The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.The device has not been returned to the manufacturer, at this time, for evaluation.A lot history review (lhr) of reau2173 showed one other similar product complaint(s) from this lot number.Device not yet returned for evaluation.
|
The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.The following were reviewed as part of this investigation: patient severity, trend analysis, applicable previous investigation(s), sample (if available), applicable fmea documents, labeling, and applicable manufacture records.Based on a review of this information, the following was concluded: the complaint of an introducer which was difficult to split is confirmed based on the state of the device.The cause is determined to be manufacturing-related.The device returned was one 4.5 fr introducer sheath, without the dilator, reportedly from a 4 fr single lumen picc solo catheter full tray with 3cg tps.Visual observation found that the microintroducer had been completely peeled.A large chunk of plastic from one of the tabs was retained on the other tab, such that a ring of material remained on one side, which had a circular impression within it.The halves of the sheath tube itself appeared to have undergone a complete and smooth peel; jagged edges, etc.Were not found.Microscopic evaluation found whitened plastic at and around the point at which the plastic portion in question, indicating strain.The point at which the ring of material on the tabs had been broken appeared very ragged, with damage reminiscent of tool marks.On the side not retaining the ring of material, an area of plastic not normally present was found integrated with the tab, which manifested a circular impression similar to that found on the ring of material attached to the other tab.Residue was found both on the sheath tubing and the tabs.From the appearance of the tabs of this microintroducer, especially in comparison to a sample, it is clear that extra material is present on/within the tabs, altering the shape thereof.It is also clear that microintroducer did not peel as intended and part of the material of one tab remained with the other tab instead of splitting away with its own tab.This complaint is confirmed.This device is manufactured in a bard facility, and this complaint is therefore manufacturing related.This device will be forwarded to the manufacturing site for further evaluation.
|