Device is a combination product.Device evaluated by mfr: it is indicated that the device will not be returned for evaluation.A review of the batch history, historical trending, and similar complaint trending review for the product family will be conducted.If there is any further relevant information from that review, a supplemental medwatch will be filed.(b)(4).
|
(b)(6).It was reported that stent restenosis occurred.In (b)(6) 2013, the patient was diagnosed with unstable angina and was referred for cardiac catheterization.Subsequently, index procedure was performed.Target lesion #1 was a de novo lesion located in the proximal left anterior descending(lad) with 80% stenosis and was 8.00mm long with a reference vessel diameter of 2.50mm.Target lesion #1 was treated with pre-dilation and placement of 2.50x24.00mm promus element¿ plus drug-eluting stent(des).Following post-dilatation, residual stenosis was 0%.Target lesion #2 was a de novo lesion located in the mid lad with 95% stenosis and was 4.00mm long with a reference vessel diameter of 5.00mm.Target lesion #2 was treated with pre-dilation and placement of 3.50x20.00mm promus element plus des.Following post-dilatation, residual stenosis was 0%.Target lesion #3 was a de novo lesion located in the distal lad with 75% stenosis and was 3.00mm long with a reference vessel diameter of 10.00mm.Target lesion #3 was treated with pre-dilation and placement of 3.00x20.00mm promus element plus des.Following post-dilatation, residual stenosis was 0%.The following day, the patient was discharged on aspirin and clopidogrel.In october 2016, the patient presented to the hospital with the complaint of chest pressure and was referred for nuclear stress test which revealed the stress test was abnormal suggestive of apical to mid anteroseptal defect and transthoracic echocardiogram revealed ejection fraction to be 45%.Given these findings, the patient was referred for cardiac catheterization.In (b)(6) 2016, the subject was hospitalized in view of cardiac catheterization due to worsening coronary artery disease (cad).The 90% in-stent restenosis in the mid section of proximal lad, with timi flow 2, was treated with 3.5mmx18mm non-bsc des.Post treatment residual stenosis was 0%.In addition, the 90% stenosis located in proximal left circumflex(lcx) was treated with the placement of a 3.00x18mm non-bsc des and 3.00mmx9mm non-bsc des.During the procedure, positive distal obtuse marginal dissection was noted with good flow.Two days after, the event was resolved and the patient was discharged on the same day.
|