A customer in the united states contacted biomérieux to report a misidentification of cap survey strain enterococcus gallinarum in association with the vitek® 2 gram-positive (gp) identification (id) test kit.The initial vitek® 2 gp id test obtained a low-discrimination result of enterococcus casseliflavus / enterococcus gallinarum.The test suggested performing a hippurate test, but instead the customer repeated the gp id test and obtained a result of enterococcus casseliflavus.The customer reported the enterococcus casseliflavus result to cap.Upon receipt of the cap survey summary indicating the correct result was enterococcus gallinarum, the customer pulled a second sample from the survey strain and tested again via vitek® 2 gp id; the result was a low-discrimination result of enterococcus casseliflavus / enterococcus gallinarum.This time, the customer acted as instructed and performed a hippurate test which was positive for gallinarum.There is no indication or report from the laboratory that the discrepant result led to any adverse event related to any patient's state of health.There was no patient directly associated with the cap survey strain.Biomérieux investigation will be initiated.
|