An internal biomérieux investigation concluded the following: no information was provided concerning the set up procedure.Two (2) laboratory reports were submitted showing an identification of s.Aureus and four (4) laboratory reports were submitted showing an identification of s.Haemolyticus.The laboratory report labeled isolate group 1: lab report shows a good identification of s.Aureus.There were four (4) atypical positive reactions (novo, dmne, bgal, mbdg) for an identification of s.Haemolyticus according to the gp knowledge base.The laboratory report labeled isolate group 2: lab report shows a very good identification of s.Aureus.There were two (2) atypical positive reactions (dmne, mbdg) for an identification of s.Haemolyticus according to the gp knowledge base.An increased number of atypical positive reactions can indicate contamination, mixed culture, use of non-recommended media or other user set up errors or an atypical strain.However, without the strain or raw data it's not possible to further evaluate the cause of the misidentification.02mar2017 ind gp lot 2420050103 met final qc release criteria.There were no issues observed on initial qc performance testing.
|