(b)(4).During processing of this complaint, attempts were made to obtain complete event, patient and device information.The absorb device is currently not commercially available in the u.S; however, it is similar to a device sold in the us.The device was not returned for evaluation.A cine was received and reviewed by an abbott vascular clinical specialist.The reviewer concluded that the patient had returned approximately 4 years post bioresorbable vascular scaffold (bvs) implant in the proximal lad.Initially scaffold was left under-expanded in the mid to proximal vessel.Patient returned with thrombosis in the proximal scaffold and restenosis in the proximal to mid distal scaffold.Restenosis was treated with metallic stent.The investigation determined the reported difficult to deploy (malapposition) and scaffold discontinuities appear to be related to circumstances of the procedure.The reported patient effects and treatments appear to be related to the scaffold malapposition.The reported patient effects of angina, myocardial infarction and thrombosis, as listed in the bvs system, absorb, instructions for use, are known adverse events associated with the use of a coronary scaffold in native coronary arteries.A review of the lot history record revealed no manufacturing nonconformities that would have contributed to this complaint.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no other similar incidents from this lot.There is no indication of product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture or labeling of the device.
|