A customer reported a misidentification of enterococcus faecium on an eeq survey, as enterococcus durans using the vitek® 2 (v7.01) gp cards.An investigation was conducted.The reference method (sequencing 16s) was performed to determine the intended result.The result was a very good identification to enterococcus faecium 100%, as expected by the eeq survey.Gp cards from the customer lot (2420024123) and a random lot (242398040) were tested using cba and tsab subcultures.The tsab subculture result for the customer lot was a low discrimination between e.Faecium and e.Durans, and the random lot had an excellent identification to e.Faecium (98%).The cba subculture result for the customer lot was a very good identification to the species e.Durans (95%), and the random lot had a very good identification to e.Faecium (93%).The customer result was reproduced with the cba subculture on the customer lot in which a false dman result was observed.The investigation concluded that the strain exhibits an atypical biochemical profile.
|