• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BARD ACCESS SYSTEMS SHERLOCK 3CG* TCS SENSOR; PERCUTANEOUS, IMPLANTED, LONG-TERM INTRAVASCULAR CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BARD ACCESS SYSTEMS SHERLOCK 3CG* TCS SENSOR; PERCUTANEOUS, IMPLANTED, LONG-TERM INTRAVASCULAR CATHETER Back to Search Results
Model Number N/A
Device Problems Use of Device Problem (1670); Malposition of Device (2616)
Patient Problem Ventricular Tachycardia (2132)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.The manufacturer has received the sample and will evaluate.Results are expected soon.A lot history review (lhr) review is not possible, as no manufacturing lot number has been provided by the complainant.
 
Event Description
Per picc nurse, after placing a picc using 3cg the patient began v-tach.The picc was confirmed by x-ray to be 5 cm too deep.This system has been working without issue previously.Additional information received by nurse stated that the picc was pulled back 5cm, which resolved the issue.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The following were reviewed as part of this investigation: patient severity, trend analysis, applicable previous investigation(s), sample (if available), applicable fmea documents, labeling, and applicable manufacture records.Based on a review of this information, the following was concluded: reported complaint of patient going into v-tach as a result of picc malposition could not be confirmed through the photo sample evaluation.The photo sample provides evidence that the catheter was likely to have been placed at max p-wave and placement was likely confirmed at max p-wave with sherlock 3cg technology.The original sherlock sensor was not returned for evaluation.Manufacturing records were reviewed and no potential contributing factors were found during manufacture and quality inspection of the device.The root cause is inconclusive.
 
Event Description
Per picc nurse, after placing a picc using 3cg the patient began v-tach.The picc was confirmed by x-ray to be 5 cm too deep.This system has been working without issue previously.Additional information received by nurse stated that the picc was pulled back 5cm, which resolved the issue.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Type of Device
PERCUTANEOUS, IMPLANTED, LONG-TERM INTRAVASCULAR CATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
BARD ACCESS SYSTEMS
605 n. 5600 w.
salt lake city UT 84116
Manufacturer (Section G)
QUALITEL CORP
4608 150th ave ne
redmond WA 98052
Manufacturer Contact
kelsey erickson
605 n. 5600 w.
salt lake city, UT 84116
8015225937
MDR Report Key6335568
MDR Text Key67580158
Report Number3006260740-2017-00083
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LJS
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K113808
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type user facility
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 08/25/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberN/A
Device Catalogue Number9770131
Device Lot NumberN/A
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer01/24/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 01/24/2017
Initial Date FDA Received02/16/2017
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received08/16/2017
Supplement Dates FDA Received08/25/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? Yes
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-