• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COOK IRELAND LTD EVOLUTION® COLONIC CONTROLLED-RELEASE STENT - UNCOVERED; MQR STENT, COLONIC METALLIC EXPANDABLE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COOK IRELAND LTD EVOLUTION® COLONIC CONTROLLED-RELEASE STENT - UNCOVERED; MQR STENT, COLONIC METALLIC EXPANDABLE Back to Search Results
Catalog Number EVO-25-30-8-C
Device Problem Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem (2906)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).As the device was not returned for evaluation; the cause of this complaint could not be conclusively determined.With the information provided a document based investigation was carried out.The customer complaint is considered to be confirmed based on customer testimony.Prior to distribution all evo-25-30-8-c devices are subjected to visual inspection and functional checks to ensure device integrity.These inspections and functional checks are outlined in internal procedures in place at (b)(4).Upon review of complaints this failure mode has not occurred previously with this lot # c1247787.The instructions for use which accompanies this device instructs the user to "visually inspect with particular attention to kinks, bends and breaks.If an abnormality is detected that would prohibit proper working condition, do not use".From the information provided, there have been no adverse effects to the patient as a result of this occurrence.Complaints of this nature will continue to be monitored for potential emerging trends.
 
Event Description
An evo-25-30-8-c ((b)(4)) was used but failed.After the initial device failure, an evo-25-30-10-c ((b)(4)) was used but also failed.A third device was used successfully.Update received 31jan2017: the patient had ovarian cancer and the stent was used for extrinsic compression in the recto-sigmoid union.The physician inserted the device through the wire guide which was previously inserted through the stricture without any problem, then the doctor made sure that the position button was in the correct placement in the device, then he proceeded to pull the trigger.Upon pulling the trigger, the stent was starting to came out of the system, the indicator button reached the ¿no return point¿ and it seems to be alright so he pull the safety wire guide and continue pulling the trigger but the stent was not deployed completely it was just about 60% although he pull the trigger till the end of the system.(this report) after that the physician decided to insert a brand new stent.The wire guide stayed in place, meanwhile, he changed the stent and proceed to start again, but this time the doctor decided not pull the ¿safety wire guide¿ when the indicator button reached the ¿no return point¿.When the indicator button reached the end of the system, the stent was deployed just around 50% again, so he tried to retrieved the stent but this maneuver wasn¿t successful and finally there was an audible snap at which point the stent would not continue to advance in any direction.At this time the stent was removed and a new one stent was used without any incident.(ref # 3001845648-2017-00057).Per reporter 31jan2017, "the stent never came out completely from the deployment system, so the doctor pulled out the all system doing long wire exchange".
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Cook ireland ltd (manufacturer) is submitting this report on behalf of (b)(4).Information pertaining to (b)(6).Importer site establishment registration number: (b)(4).Upon evaluation of the returned device, it was noted that the device was badly damaged from the chlorine that was used to sterilize it prior to return.The lockwire was present and in place.The flexor had stretched.Deployment was not possible.The remaining part of the stent was pulled out from the sheath, the flange of the stent was missing when pulled out.As per rep info provided on attempting to sterilize with chlorine - ' the stent was dissolved'.Therefore, it is assumed that the flange of the stent dissolved as a result of them attempting to sterilize the device with chlorine.The customer complaint was confirmed as the flexor was stretched.Prior to distribution all evo-25-30-8-c devices are subjected to visual inspection and functional checks to ensure device integrity.These inspections and functional checks are outlined in internal procedures in place at cirl.Upon review of complaints this failure mode has not occurred previously with this lot # c1247787.The instructions for use which accompanies this device instructs the user to "visually inspect with particular attention to kinks, bends and breaks.If an abnormality is detected that would prohibit proper working condition, do not use".From the information provided, there have been no adverse effects to the patient as a result of this occurrence.Complaints of this nature will continue to be monitored for potential emerging trends.
 
Event Description
This follow up is due to be submitted as the device was returned to cirl.An evo-25-30-8-c (pr172470) was used but failed.After the initial device failure, an evo-25-30-10-c (pr172463) was used but also failed.A third device was used successfully.Update received 31jan2017: the patient had ovarian cancer and the stent was used for extrinsic compression in the recto-sigmoid union.The physician inserted the device through the wire guide which was previously inserted through the stricture without any problem, then the doctor made sure that the position button was in the correct placement in the device, then he proceeded to pull the trigger.Upon pulling the trigger, the stent was starting to came out of the system, the indicator button reached the ¿no return point¿ and it seems to be alright so he pull the safety wire guide and continue pulling the trigger but the stent was not deployed completely it was just about 60% although he pull the trigger till the end of the system.(this report) after that the physician decided to insert a brand new stent.The wire guide stayed in place, meanwhile, he changed the stent and proceed to start again, but this time the doctor decided not pull the ¿safety wire guide¿ when the indicator button reached the ¿no return point¿.When the indicator button reached the end of the system, the stent was deployed just around 50% again, so he tried to retrieved the stent but this maneuver wasn¿t successful and finally there was an audible snap at which point the stent would not continue to advance in any direction.At this time the stent was removed and a new one stent was used without any incident.(ref # 3001845648-2017-00057) per reporter (b)(6) 2017, "the stent never came out completely from the deployment system, so the doctor pulled out the all system doing long wire exchange".
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EVOLUTION® COLONIC CONTROLLED-RELEASE STENT - UNCOVERED
Type of Device
MQR STENT, COLONIC METALLIC EXPANDABLE
Manufacturer (Section D)
COOK IRELAND LTD
o halloran road
limerick
Manufacturer Contact
tracy o'sullivan
o'halloran road
national technology park
limerick 
061334440
MDR Report Key6345463
MDR Text Key68089068
Report Number3001845648-2017-00056
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MQR
UDI-Device Identifier10827002480282
UDI-Public(01)10827002480282(17)180704(10)C1247787
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K113510
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 03/08/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received02/21/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberEVO-25-30-8-C
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Distributor Facility Aware Date02/21/2017
Event Location Hospital
Date Manufacturer Received01/27/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured07/04/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-