• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: REVISION OPTICS RAINDROP NEAR VISION INLAY; CORNEAL INLAY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

REVISION OPTICS RAINDROP NEAR VISION INLAY; CORNEAL INLAY Back to Search Results
Model Number PP6-530-0027-US
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Corneal Clouding/Hazing (1878)
Event Date 01/24/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The device history record (dhr) for this manufacturing lot was reviewed and the device met all release criteria and there were no discrepancies or unusual findings that relate to the reported event.The explanted corneal inlay has not been returned to the manufacturer at this time.Corneal haze and inlay removal are listed in the device labeling as known potential risks.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
The subject was enrolled in the clinical study for (b)(4) and underwent surgery on (b)(6) 2013 with implantation of the investigational corneal inlay in the left eye.Peripheral edge haze was noted during the study at month 4 and month 12 and was treated with topical steroids.The edge haze was not clinically significant.The patient reported experiencing dissatisfaction with uncorrected near and distance vision over the past six months.Upon examination on (b)(6) 2017, the patient presented with 2+ recurrent corneal haze, although there was no decrease in best corrected distance visual acuity (bcdva) compared to baseline.On (b)(6) 2017, the inlay was explanted due to recurrent corneal haze (and patient's dissatisfaction with uncorrected vision).Additional information has been requested.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The explanted inlay was returned to the manufacturer and subjected to visual microscopic inspection and dimensional analysis.The findings revealed that the edge of the inlay was wavy because of dehydration which precluded the measurement of edge thickness.The diameter was measured and found to be within specifications.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
Patient follow-up was requested from the surgeon, who provided the following additional information.Although the patient had recurrent corneal haze, the inlay was primarily explanted due to the patient's dissatisfaction with uncorrected near vision.The patient is stable with a good prognosis.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
RAINDROP NEAR VISION INLAY
Type of Device
CORNEAL INLAY
Manufacturer (Section D)
REVISION OPTICS
25651 atlantic ocean dr.,
ste. a1
lake forest CA 92630 8835
Manufacturer (Section G)
REVISION OPTICS
25651 atlantic ocean dr.,
ste. a1
lake forest CA 92630 8835
Manufacturer Contact
pushpita singh
25651 atlantic ocean dr.,
ste. a1
lake forest, CA 92630-8835
9497072740
MDR Report Key6355387
MDR Text Key68209229
Report Number3005956347-2017-00019
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LQE
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
G090149
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/24/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received02/23/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date06/01/2013
Device Model NumberPP6-530-0027-US
Device Lot Number002354
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer02/23/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received03/03/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured07/09/2012
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
FEMTOSECOND LASER FOR CREATION OF CORNEAL FLAP
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age49 YR
-
-