• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MDT PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO SYNCHROMED II; PUMP, INFUSION, IMPLANTED, PROGRAMMABLE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MDT PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO SYNCHROMED II; PUMP, INFUSION, IMPLANTED, PROGRAMMABLE Back to Search Results
Model Number 8637-40
Device Problem Failure to Interrogate (1332)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 03/01/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
Information was received from a healthcare professional (hcp) and a manufacturer's representative (rep) regarding a patient receiving 2,000 mcg/ml baclofen at a dose of 115 mcg/day and 20 mg/ml morphine at a dose of 1.15 mg/day via an implantable infusion pump for intractable spasticity and multiple sclerosis.It was reported that the hcp had a telemetry problem with their clinician programmer.The hcp tried to interrogate the pump but was unable to complete telemetry.As troubleshooting the hcp tried different positions and removed electronics devices from the room, there were no more cell rooms in the room.The hcp tried unplugging the ultrasound machine and unplugging the power running to the bed which did not resolve the issue.The pump was not flipped and was refilled on (b)(6) 2017.Using a different clinician programmer did not resolve the issue.The clinician programmers that were used had been used successfully before in the same room to interrogate other pumps.No symptoms were reported.The hcp brought the patient outside and were still unable to read the pump.It was reported that on (b)(6) 2017 the rep talked to the hcp who stated that the patient used a personal therapy manager (ptm) programmer that also was not communicating successfully to the pump.The rep reported that the patient had not had any trauma to the pump or medical procedures that possibly the pump was exposed to.
 
Event Description
Additional information was received from a healthcare professional (hcp) on 2017-mar-06.It was reported that the plan was to have a local manufacturer's representative (rep) meet with the patient to see if the rep could interrogate the pump with a different programmer.The hcp was "very uncomfortable sitting on this, and was eager to have something clarified or fixed soon.".
 
Manufacturer Narrative
A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Additional information was received from a manufacturer's representative (rep) on 2017-mar-22.It was reported by the rep that they were still unable to establish telemetry with this pump using a clinician programmer as of (b)(6) 2017.They attempted using multiple programmers.Rep stated that "there was nothing wrong" with therapy and patient was doing fine medically as far as the rep knew.It was reviewed that the healthcare professional (hcp) should consider replacing the pump and the rep was to relay that information to the hcp.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Additional information was received from a healthcare professional (hcp) on 2017-apr-03.It was reported that the patient's weight was (b)(6) lbs at the time of the event.
 
Event Description
Additional information was received from a manufacturer's representative (rep) on (b)(6) 2017.It was reported that the pump was going to be replaced on (b)(6) 2017.The pump was to be returned to the manufacturer for analysis.No further complications were expected or anticipated.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Interrogation of implantable pump serial number (b)(4) revealed the device had been programmed to deliver 2,000 mcg/ml of lioresal at 114.9 mcg/day and 20 mg/ml of morphine at 1.149 mg/day via the simple continuous infusion mode.Evaluation of the device revealed the following: analysis identified a bit flip in the telemetry handler memory (circuit board) which resulted in inconsistent telemetry.Eval code-conclusion (b)(4) has been updated to eval code-conclusion (b)(4).This device issue is known and documented in the labeling per (b)(4) ¿ n¿vision clinician programmer with software synchromed ii infusion systems.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Corrected information: sex, date of birth.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SYNCHROMED II
Type of Device
PUMP, INFUSION, IMPLANTED, PROGRAMMABLE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MDT PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO
rd 31 km 24 hm 4
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer (Section G)
MDT PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO
rd 31 km 24 hm 4
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer Contact
lisa clark
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
7635263920
MDR Report Key6376526
MDR Text Key69017895
Report Number3004209178-2017-04978
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LKK
UDI-Device Identifier00643169100824
UDI-Public00643169100824
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P860004
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Remedial Action Inspection
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 06/28/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date05/28/2015
Device Model Number8637-40
Device Catalogue Number8637-40
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer06/15/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 03/01/2017
Initial Date FDA Received03/03/2017
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
06/27/2017
Supplement Dates FDA Received03/07/2017
03/28/2017
04/05/2017
04/19/2017
06/28/2017
10/02/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured12/02/2013
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age49 YR
Patient Weight80
-
-