• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AV-TEMECULA-CT SUPERA SELF-EXPANDING STENT SYSTEM; SELF EXPANDING STENT SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AV-TEMECULA-CT SUPERA SELF-EXPANDING STENT SYSTEM; SELF EXPANDING STENT SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Catalog Number S-50-120-120-P6
Device Problem Detachment Of Device Component (1104)
Patient Problem Vessel Or Plaque, Device Embedded In (1204)
Event Date 02/09/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Internal file number - (b)(4): during processing of this complaint, attempts were made to obtain complete event, patient and device information.The device is expected to be returned for evaluation.It has not yet been received.A follow up report will be submitted with all relevant information.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the procedure was to treat a severely calcified lesion in the mildly tortuous, 5 mm diameter proximal popliteal artery.An introducer sheath was positioned in the common femoral artery and pre-dilatation was performed via inflation of a 4.0 mm x 100 mm armada 35 balloon to 12 atmospheres.A 5.0 mm x 120 mm x 120 cm 6f supera peripheral self-expanding stent system (sess) was advanced to the lesion without resistance and was deployed without difficulty; the stent was confirmed under strict fluoroscopy to have completely exited the sheath and was confirmed to be deployed from the device prior to initiating withdrawal.The supera delivery system was then withdrawn without resistance under fluoroscopy, however, the nose cone tip detached in the patient during withdrawal.A 4.0 x 33 mm xience alpine stent was deployed embedding and securing the nose code against the vessel wall.There were no adverse patient sequelae.Additional information has been requested.No additional information was provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).The device was not returned for evaluation.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no other similar incidents reported from this lot.The reported patient effect of device embedded in vessel or plaque is listed as known patient effect of peripheral stenting procedures.It should be noted that the supera peripheral self-expanding stent systems instruction for use (ifu) states: prepare the vessel utilizing standard angioplasty technique using a balloon size greater than or equal to the stent diameter.Refer to the balloon instructions for use.The recommended balloon size should be equal to or greater than 5.0 for a 5.0mm stent implant.It is unknown if the deviation to the ifu contributed to the reported separation.Since the device was not returned for evaluation there is insufficient evidence to determine if a product quality issue, with respect to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device, contributed to the reported separation of the nose cone tip of the supera device.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
Subsequent to the initial filed medwatch report the following additional relevant information was received: the procedure was to treat a severely calcified lesion in the mildly tortuous, 5mm diameter left superficial femoral artery.The location of the detached nose cone that was secured by the alpine stent is in the left proximal popliteal artery.An angiogram confirmed adequate flow.No additional information was provided.User facility medwatch report received that states: surgeon performing a percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (ptca) and stenting of the left superficial femoral artery.Upon completion of the stent deployment when the delivery device was removed over the wire, the nose cone of the device was dislodged and remained in the proximal left popliteal artery against the wall of the artery, wires exchanges were performed in the area where the nose cone was located - the area where the nose cone was located was stented with an expandable stent deployed across the area of the nose cone, securing it in place.Angiogram follow up with adequate flow.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).
 
Event Description
Subsequent to the previously filed medwatch report, the following additional information was received from the physician during a meeting on 30 may 2017: prior to deploying the 5.0mm x 120mm x 120cm 6f supera peripheral self-expanding stent in the popliteal artery, the lesion had been pre-dilated with the 4.0mm-sized armada 35 balloon because the patient reference vessel diameter was 4.0mm, not 5mm as previously reported.Additionally, the reported detached nose cone tip was located within the distal 3rd portion of the implanted supera stent and then secured using the 4.0 x 33mm xience alpine as previously reported.No additional information was provided.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SUPERA SELF-EXPANDING STENT SYSTEM
Type of Device
SELF EXPANDING STENT SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
AV-TEMECULA-CT
abbott vascular
26531 ynez road
temecula CA 92591 4628
Manufacturer (Section G)
ABBOTT VASCULAR, TEMECULA, CA USA REG# 2024168
abbott vascular
26531 ynez road
temecula CA 92591 4628
Manufacturer Contact
connie speck
abbott vascular
26531 ynez road
temecula, CA 92591-4628
9519143996
MDR Report Key6376677
MDR Text Key69031141
Report Number2024168-2017-01765
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NIP
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P120020
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Remedial Action Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 06/07/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/03/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date10/31/2018
Device Catalogue NumberS-50-120-120-P6
Device Lot Number6111061
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received05/30/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured11/01/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age88 YR
-
-