The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.The device has not been returned to the manufacturer, at this time, for evaluation.A lot history review (lhr) of reax0254 showed no other similar product complaint(s) from this lot number.
|
The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.The following were reviewed as part of this investigation: patient severity, trend analysis, applicable previous investigation(s), sample (if available), applicable fmea documents, labeling, and applicable manufacture records.Based on a review of this information, the following was concluded: the complaint of a leak is confirmed, and the cause is determined to be use-related.The device returned is one powerline 6 fr dual lumen polyurethane catheter with surecuff.Tactual evaluation found evidence of clamping on both extension legs.Visual observation found residue at and proximal to the cuff.The printing on the bifurcation hub and extension legs was in good condition.Functional testing found both lumens to be patent to infusion and aspiration.When infusing the red lumen, a leak was found at the distal end of the cuff.At one point, during infusion, water came out of the opposite luer.Later, this was not reproduced.It is therefore suspected to be due to expansion of one lumen forcing fluid out of the other.Microscopic evaluation found two horizontal lines extending out distally from the cuff.One of these lines was a hole, and the other did not extend through the wall; both were on the red lumen side of the septum.The break surface of the hole did not appear striated, leading to the conclusion that this damage was not caused by a sharp instrument, but rather a tearing failure mode.The lines parallel to the axis at the cuff, including the hole, as well as the preferential kink noted at that location, are consistent with repeated bending at that site which finally resulted in fracture.The failure is therefore likely use-related.The following statements in the ifu may be helpful: ¿the catheter must be secured in place to minimize the risk of catheter breakage and embolization.¿ avoid accidental device contact with sharp instruments and mechanical damage to the catheter ¿material.Use only smooth edged, atraumatic clamps or forceps.¿ ¿do not use the catheter if there is any evidence of mechanical damage or leaking.Avoid sharp or acute angles during implantation which could compromise the patency of the catheter lumen(s).¿ ¿close the skin at the venipuncture site as necessary, taking care not to damage the catheter.¿ ¿suture catheter wings (or use statlock* device) and suture catheter at exit site using removable suture wing.(avoid nicking catheter with suture needle.)¿ ¿secure catheter at exit site with a sterile dressing.Avoid tension on the catheter segment to prevent dislodging the catheter.¿.
|