• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ANGIOMED GMBH & CO. MEDIZINTECHNIK KG FLUENCY PLUS ENDOVASCULAR STENT GRAFT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ANGIOMED GMBH & CO. MEDIZINTECHNIK KG FLUENCY PLUS ENDOVASCULAR STENT GRAFT Back to Search Results
Catalog Number FEM08060
Device Problems Break (1069); Difficult to Advance (2920); Activation Failure (3270)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 01/11/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The device history records are being reviewed.The event is currently under investigation.
 
Event Description
It was reported that during a sheathless stenting procedure for treatment of a pre-dilated stenosis of the left antecubital area in the forearm near an arterial anastomosis via access through the brachial artery, the stent delivery system was difficult to insert through the access site.Upon withdrawal of the system after stent graft placement, a piece of the delivery system was allegedly left hanging out of the hole in the arm.The delivery system was removed without any issues.As reported, the distal end of the stent graft did not fully expand upon post-dilation; however, as this was only 1 mm or less there was no need for any further treatment and the procedure was completed.There was no reported patient injury.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The lot history records have been reviewed with special attention to the manufacturing and inspection of this product and the product was found to have met all specifications prior to shipment.There is no indication for a manufacturing-related failure.The evaluation of the returned delivery system confirmed the breakage of the inner catheter.All parts of the device could be removed from the patient.The reported insertion difficulties could not be reproduced; no defect of the distal tip of the outer sheath leading to the reported difficulty could be identified.On the basis of the images provided, it could be confirmed that the distal end of the implanted stent graft was marginally less expanded than the proximal part, however, the blood flow through the stent graft was good.As reported, no further treatment was necessary.Potential contributing factors to the reported event have been considered.Previous investigations of similar complaints have been reviewed.The reported insertion difficulties and subsequent inner catheter breakage may be associated with not using an introducer sheath, as reported by the customer.The reported failure to expand as well as the difficult advancement and inner catheter breakage also may be associated with a challenging stent placement site.In this case, it was reported that the tracking path was not tortuous or calcified and the proximal end of the stent graft was placed in a straight section of the lumen prior to stent graft deployment.Furthermore, pre- and post-dilation was performed.In this case, the failure of an incomplete stent graft expansion did not have any clinical influence and no further treatment was necessary.On the basis of the information available and the evaluation of the returned device, a definite root cause for the reported event could not be determined.The ifu states that an introducer sheath of appropriate inner diameter is required for the procedure.Furthermore, the ifu states: "after removing the delivery system, visually confirm that the complete system has been removed.Inner catheter with distal flared end.".
 
Event Description
It was reported that during a sheathless stenting procedure for treatment of a pre-dilated stenosis of the left antecubital area in the forearm near an arterial anastomosis via access through the brachial artery, the stent delivery system was difficult to insert through the access site.Upon withdrawal of the system after stent graft placement, a piece of the delivery system was allegedly left hanging out of the hole in the arm.The delivery system was removed without any issues.As reported, the distal end of the stent graft did not fully expand upon post-dilation; however, as this was only 1 mm or less there was no need for any further treatment and the procedure was completed.There was no reported patient injury.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
FLUENCY PLUS ENDOVASCULAR STENT GRAFT
Type of Device
ENDOVASCULAR STENT GRAFT
Manufacturer (Section D)
ANGIOMED GMBH & CO. MEDIZINTECHNIK KG
wachhausstrasse 6
karlsruhe 76227
GM  76227
Manufacturer (Section G)
ANGIOMED GMBH & CO. MEDIZINTECHNIK KG -9681442
wachhausstrasse 6
karlsruhe 76227
GM   76227
Manufacturer Contact
daniela mueller
wachhausstrasse 6
karlsruhe 76227
GM   76227
0497219445
MDR Report Key6406706
MDR Text Key70093619
Report Number9681442-2017-00108
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code PFV
UDI-Device Identifier04049519008493
UDI-Public(01)04049519008493(17)190722(10)ANAU2983
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P130029
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 05/11/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date07/22/2019
Device Catalogue NumberFEM08060
Device Lot NumberANAU2983
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer03/14/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 02/14/2017
Initial Date FDA Received03/15/2017
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received05/11/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/08/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age54 YR
Patient Weight84
-
-