• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. SURESCAN; STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, IMPLANTED (PAIN RELIEF)

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. SURESCAN; STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, IMPLANTED (PAIN RELIEF) Back to Search Results
Model Number 97714
Device Problems High impedance (1291); Inappropriate/Inadequate Shock/Stimulation (1574); Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913)
Patient Problem Electric Shock (2554)
Event Date 01/31/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Other applicable components are: product id: 3708120, serial#: (b)(4), product type: extension.Product id: 3708120, serial#: (b)(4), product type: extension.
 
Event Description
Information was received from a patient with an implantable neurostimulator (ins) for the treatment of non-malignant pain.It was reported that the wires were failing on the table during the ins replacement surgery on (b)(6) 2017.The patient reported that out of the 16 ¿wires,¿ only 8 were working, and once they woke up from the surgery, only 7 were working.It was noted that it was an extension in the back that had failed, but it was not specified which extension failed.When the patient was in recover after the procedure, the device was "going crazy" and sporadically shocking the patient.The programming was turned down.No further complications are anticipated.Addition information was received from a manufacturer representative.It was reported that there was high impedance during the surgery when tested at 0.7v.The impedances read normal when tested at a higher voltage of 3v.After the surgery, there was still high impedance when tested at 0.7v.The cause of the high impedance was unknown at the time of the event.It was also reported that the shocking that occurred after the procedure dissipated when the stimulation was turned down.It was noted that the electrodes could not have been tested prior to the procedure because the surgery was only performed to replace the battery and use the wires that were already implanted.No further complications are anticipated.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SURESCAN
Type of Device
STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, IMPLANTED (PAIN RELIEF)
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer Contact
lisa clark
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
7635263920
MDR Report Key6428382
MDR Text Key70769206
Report Number3004209178-2017-06234
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code GZB
UDI-Device Identifier00643169109483
UDI-Public00643169109483
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P840001
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,consum
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 03/23/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date02/28/2017
Device Model Number97714
Device Catalogue Number97714
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 03/15/2017
Initial Date FDA Received03/23/2017
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received03/15/2017
Supplement Dates FDA Received10/02/2017
Date Device Manufactured04/08/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age44 YR
-
-