An event regarding infection involving an unknown insert was reported.The event was not confirmed.Method & results: -device evaluation and results: a visual, functional and dimensional inspection could not be performed as the device was not returned.-medical records received and evaluation: the provided medical information was submitted to a consulting clinician who indicated that: "x-ray printouts, all undated, include two ap¿s of bilateral knee, weightbearing, as well as a lateral of the left and a lateral of the right, and two bilateral patellar views, all demonstrating bilateral cemented mako medial uka components in nominal position with bilateral proximal tibial plates with three proximal screws, and on the right three distal screws, and on the left, four distal screws in the previous fixation, as well as lateral tibial staple in both tibias traversing a healed proximal tibial osteotomy."no patient demographics, no examination of explanted component, no confirmation of ¿infection¿ or bacteriology reports, and no clarification on which side the surgical revision was performed are available.There is no evidence this alleged infection management was related to the uka prosthetic components." -device history review: not performed as the device was not properly identified.-complaint history review: not performed as the device was not properly identified.Conclusions: the event could not be confirmed nor the root cause determined because insufficient information was provided.Provided medical records were submitted to clinician who indicated that no confirmation of ¿infection and there is no evidence this alleged infection management was related to the uka prosthetic components.Further information such as return of device, histopathology report & follow-up notes are needed to investigate this event further.If additional information and/or device becomes available, this investigation will be reopened.
|