• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. SURESCAN; STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, IMPLANTED (PAIN RELIEF)

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. SURESCAN; STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, IMPLANTED (PAIN RELIEF) Back to Search Results
Model Number 97713
Device Problems Unstable (1667); Charging Problem (2892); Communication or Transmission Problem (2896)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 03/07/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Information was received from a manufacturer representative regarding a patient with an implantable neurostimulator (ins).It was reported that the patient was having poor coupling and was not getting any black boxes when recharging.An x-ray was performed and it was determined that the ins was not flipped.The decision was made to replace the ins.During the replacement surgery, it was determined that the ins was flipped/in an upside-down position.It was noted that during the original implant surgery, the ins was implanted properly and the surgeon had asked for confirmation on how the ins was to be inserted.No patient symptoms were reported.No further complications are anticipated.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Analysis results were not available at the time of this report.A follow-up report will be sent when analysis is completed.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Additional information was received from a manufacturer representative.It was reported that the ins was implanted properly at the initial implant procedure.At explant, the surgeon was surprised that the ins was inverted/upside-down.The cause of the ins flip remains unknown.No further complications are anticipated.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Analysis of the ins (b)(4) found c200 ins functionally okay/insignificant anomalies.See product analysis summary below.Product analysis #701742429: analysis information -- 2017-05-12 13:54:52 cst pli# 10 product id# 97713 the implantable neurostimulator (ins) passed functional testing.The ins passed the final functional test on the automated test console.A lab functional test determined there was good stable output on the electrode pairs the ins had when it was received.A lab functional test determined there was good stable output on all electrode pairs.Analysis determined there were no issues when pressing on the ins can.The ins was recharged at room temperature with 1 cm spacing between the recharger antenna and the ins and no issue was observed.{} the ins was recharged at room temperature with 1 cm spacing between the recharger antenna and the ins and no coupling issues were observed.{} analysis determined the telemetry was acceptable.Due to the reported complaint, a coupling test was performed to verify the ins was obtaining good coupling.Recharging was performed at 0, 1, 2, and 3 cm spacing to monitor coupling.{tested the coupling between recharge antenna and ins at body temperature and various spacings.The results were 8 bars coupling at 0 cm spacing, 8 bars coupling at 1 cm spacing, 4 bars coupling at 2 cm spacing, and 0 bars coupling at 3 cm spacing.} the same coupling was observed on a known good ins.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SURESCAN
Type of Device
STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, IMPLANTED (PAIN RELIEF)
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer Contact
lisa woodward clark
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
7635263920
MDR Report Key6438758
MDR Text Key70996157
Report Number3004209178-2017-06468
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code GZB
UDI-Device Identifier00643169109490
UDI-Public00643169109490
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P840001
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 05/19/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/28/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date09/14/2017
Device Model Number97713
Device Catalogue Number97713
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer04/10/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received05/12/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/23/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age48 YR
-
-