• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. SURESCAN; STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, IMPLANTED (PAIN RELIEF)

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. SURESCAN; STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, IMPLANTED (PAIN RELIEF) Back to Search Results
Model Number 97714
Device Problems Unintended Collision (1429); Device Displays Incorrect Message (2591); Battery Problem (2885); Charging Problem (2892); Communication or Transmission Problem (2896); Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913)
Patient Problem Pain (1994)
Event Date 01/01/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Information was received from a patient who was implanted with an implantable neurostimulator (ins) for non-malignant pain.The patient reported that there was poor telemetry/communication or no telemetry with recharging.The patient reported that his ins was dead and it wouldn't charge.The patient reported that his ins had ¿been doing half charges¿ and it had not been charging all the way.The patient reported that 2 days prior to the report his ins completely died and a ¿bunch of pain started.¿ the patient reported seeing the reposition antenna screen but he had never seen that screen before when repositioning the antenna.The patient reported that the patient programmer (pp) said resync.The patient reported that he had only been able to do half charges for about a month now but the last time he recharged it he turned it down a bunch.The patient reported that he was waiting for a manufacturer¿s representative (rep) to call him back.The patient reported that he was supposed to get his ins ¿jump started¿ or get the battery replaced.The patient reported that he was in a lot of a pain and his back was throbbing and his legs were on fire.The patient reported that he went to the emergency room for the pain on the night prior to the report because it was so bad and got pain medication that didn't work.No further complications anticipated.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Additional information was received from the consumer through a manufacturer representative (rep) stating their ins would not communicate with the programmer and the recharger.Patient first noticed they couldn't charge the ins on (b)(6) and the last time they felt stimulation was on (b)(6).The patient was informed that the ins would not go in an overdischarged state that soon.The rep stated that the por message was the only thing that came up on the recharger after the ins was pulled out of overdischarge.The manufacturer representative will follow up with the patient on bypassing the por and charging the ins.The rep stated that the patient associates the issue to some degree with a fall they had on (b)(6) 2017 where the patient fell directly on the ins.Rep also mentioned that the patient fell off a ladder on to his back on (b)(6) 2017 but noted that there wasn't anything specifically related to that fall.After the fall on (b)(6), the patient noticed they couldn't charge the ins the next day, felt stim increased in intensity post-fall and then stopped feeling stim on (b)(6).No further patient complications have been reported as a result of this event.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Additional information was received from a consumer.It was reported that the patient's ins died and had to be replaced.The patient stated that they had to wait 3 months to get the device replaced.The patient also stated that the battery had to be replaced as the battery would not charge.No further complications were reported or anticipated.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SURESCAN
Type of Device
STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, IMPLANTED (PAIN RELIEF)
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer Contact
lisa woodward clark
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
7635263920
MDR Report Key6443039
MDR Text Key71242789
Report Number3004209178-2017-06594
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code GZB
UDI-Device Identifier00643169109483
UDI-Public00643169109483
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P840001
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,consum
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 07/28/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date12/28/2016
Device Model Number97714
Device Catalogue Number97714
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 03/27/2017
Initial Date FDA Received03/29/2017
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
07/25/2017
07/25/2017
Supplement Dates FDA Received04/03/2017
07/28/2017
10/02/2017
Date Device Manufactured02/12/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age26 YR
-
-