Model Number 97714 |
Device Problems
Unintended Collision (1429); Device Displays Incorrect Message (2591); Battery Problem (2885); Charging Problem (2892); Communication or Transmission Problem (2896); Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913)
|
Patient Problem
Pain (1994)
|
Event Date 01/01/2017 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Event Description
|
Information was received from a patient who was implanted with an implantable neurostimulator (ins) for non-malignant pain.The patient reported that there was poor telemetry/communication or no telemetry with recharging.The patient reported that his ins was dead and it wouldn't charge.The patient reported that his ins had ¿been doing half charges¿ and it had not been charging all the way.The patient reported that 2 days prior to the report his ins completely died and a ¿bunch of pain started.¿ the patient reported seeing the reposition antenna screen but he had never seen that screen before when repositioning the antenna.The patient reported that the patient programmer (pp) said resync.The patient reported that he had only been able to do half charges for about a month now but the last time he recharged it he turned it down a bunch.The patient reported that he was waiting for a manufacturer¿s representative (rep) to call him back.The patient reported that he was supposed to get his ins ¿jump started¿ or get the battery replaced.The patient reported that he was in a lot of a pain and his back was throbbing and his legs were on fire.The patient reported that he went to the emergency room for the pain on the night prior to the report because it was so bad and got pain medication that didn't work.No further complications anticipated.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Event Description
|
Additional information was received from the consumer through a manufacturer representative (rep) stating their ins would not communicate with the programmer and the recharger.Patient first noticed they couldn't charge the ins on (b)(6) and the last time they felt stimulation was on (b)(6).The patient was informed that the ins would not go in an overdischarged state that soon.The rep stated that the por message was the only thing that came up on the recharger after the ins was pulled out of overdischarge.The manufacturer representative will follow up with the patient on bypassing the por and charging the ins.The rep stated that the patient associates the issue to some degree with a fall they had on (b)(6) 2017 where the patient fell directly on the ins.Rep also mentioned that the patient fell off a ladder on to his back on (b)(6) 2017 but noted that there wasn't anything specifically related to that fall.After the fall on (b)(6), the patient noticed they couldn't charge the ins the next day, felt stim increased in intensity post-fall and then stopped feeling stim on (b)(6).No further patient complications have been reported as a result of this event.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Event Description
|
Additional information was received from a consumer.It was reported that the patient's ins died and had to be replaced.The patient stated that they had to wait 3 months to get the device replaced.The patient also stated that the battery had to be replaced as the battery would not charge.No further complications were reported or anticipated.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|