• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CORDIS DE MEXICO PRECISEPRO RX US CAROTID SYSTE; STENT, CAROTID

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CORDIS DE MEXICO PRECISEPRO RX US CAROTID SYSTE; STENT, CAROTID Back to Search Results
Model Number PC0730RXC
Device Problem Crack (1135)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 02/17/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
During deployment of the precise pro rx us carotid system stent, there was significant resistance and the stent delivery system broke (the delivery system cracked) while attempting to appropriately deliver the stent to the proper location.A different precise pro system was used to complete the procedure.During deployment the physician felt resistance and then felt none.The stent was not deployed but the part pinned was at the rotating hemostatic valve (rhv).Out of an abundance of caution, the physician removed the device and discovered that the delivery system had broken (cracked).The physician took a different precise pro carotid stent and completed the case without incident.The product was stored, handled, inspected and prepped according to the instructions for use (ifu).The device was prepped appropriately.The physician is familiar with the device and performed all prep task appropriately.There wasn't anything unusual noted about the stent delivery system prior to use.The intended procedure/target lesion was the carotid artery; however the lesion characteristics are unknown.When removed from the tray, the stent was still constrained within the outer member/sheath.The following information is unknown: if the tuohy borst (hemostasis) valve was in the open or closed position when received; if the temperature exposure indicator on the pouch was checked to confirm that the black dotted pattern with a grey background is clearly visible; the sheath introducer brand and size, the guiding catheter brand and size; if the stent delivery system (sds) pass through any acute bends; if the delivery of the sds to the lesion ipsilateral or contralateral; if any unusual force used at any time during the procedure; if the sds have to pass through a previously placed stent; if there was any difficulty advancing the sds over the guidewire or the embolic protection device; the location where the difficulty occurred.The product was returned for analysis.One non-sterile units of precise pro rx us carotid system was returned.Per visual analysis the hemovalve was returned opened.The stent was not deployed and the outer body was found separated at 21.9cm from the outer member brite tip.A kink or bent condition was found on the device at 12.8cm from the outer member brite tip.No other damages were noted.Functional analysis was not performed due to the separated condition found on the outer body of the device.Per dimensional analysis the od and id were measured adjacent to the separated condition and results were found within specification.The stroke length could not be measured due to the separated condition on the outer body.Per sem analysis of the separated section of the proximal outer member (polyamide), the distal section of the outer member shows a twisted or ripped condition that indicates elongation at the point of material rupture.Elongation is a common characteristic of pieces which were stretched or pulled until separation.There was also evidence of adhered or transferred material at the fused area found in some separated areas of polyamide.The available evidence may suggest that the catheter proximal outer member was fused to the catheter distal section at a certain time.A device history record (dhr) review of lot 17449576 revealed no anomalies or non-conformances during the manufacturing and inspection processes that can be associated with the reported event.The reported ¿stent delivery system (sds) - resistance/friction-outer sheath - in patient¿ and ¿stent delivery system (sds)-cracked - in patient¿ was confirmed through analysis of the returned device.The exact cause of the events could not be determined during analysis.Based on the information available for review, vessel characteristics (although unknown) or procedural factors may have contributed to the event as evidenced by the description of resistance, the kink noted on the device and the elongations noted on the outer surface during analysis which are associated with the application of excessive force.According to the instructions for use ¿extract the stent delivery system from the tray.Examine the device for any damage.Evaluate the distal end of the catheter to ensure that the stent is contained within the outer sheath.Do not use if the stent is partially deployed.Note: if resistance is met during delivery system introduction, the system should be withdrawn and another system should be used.Note: if any resistance is met during delivery system withdrawal, advance the outer sheath until the outer sheath marker contacts the catheter tip and withdraw the system as one unit.¿ neither the dhr review nor the product analysis suggests that the event experienced by the customer could be related to the manufacturing process; therefore, no corrective/preventive action will be taken at this time.
 
Event Description
During deployment of the precise pro rx us carotid system stent, there was significant resistance and the stent delivery system broke (the delivery system cracked) while attempting to appropriately deliver the stent to the proper location.A different precise pro system was used to complete the procedure.During deployment the physician felt resistance and then felt none.The stent was not deployed but the part pinned was at the rotating hemostatic valve (rhv).Out an abundance of caution, the physician removed the device and discover that the delivery system had broken (cracked).The physician took a different precise pro carotid stent and completed the case without incident.The product was stored, handled, inspected and prepped according to the instructions for use (ifu).The device was prepped appropriately.The physician is familiar with the device and performed all prep task appropriately.There wasn't anything unusual noted about the stent delivery system prior to use.The intended procedure/target lesion was the carotid artery, however the lesion characteristics are unknown.When removed from the tray, the stent was still constrained within the outer member/sheath.The following information is unknown: if the tuohy borst (hemostasis) valve was in the open or closed position when received; if the temperature exposure indicator on the pouch was checked to confirm that the black dotted pattern with a grey background is clearly visible; the sheath introducer brand and size, the guiding catheter brand and size; if the stent delivery system (sds) pass through any acute bends; if the delivery of the sds to the lesion ipsilateral or contralateral; if any unusual force used at any time during the procedure; if the sds have to pass through a previously placed stent; if there was any difficulty advancing the sds over the guidewire or the embolic protection device; the location where the difficulty occurred.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
During deployment of the precise pro rx us carotid system stent, there was significant resistance and the stent delivery system broke (the delivery system cracked) while attempting to appropriately deliver the stent to the proper location.A different precise pro system was used to complete the procedure.During deployment the physician felt resistance and then felt none.The stent was not deployed but the part pinned was at the rotating hemostatic valve (rhv).Out of an abundance of caution, the physician removed the device and discovered that the delivery system had broken (cracked).The physician took a different precise pro carotid stent and completed the case without incident.The product was stored, handled, inspected and prepped according to the instructions for use (ifu).The device was prepped appropriately.The physician is familiar with the device and performed all prep task appropriately.There wasn¿t anything unusual noted about the stent delivery system prior to use.The intended procedure/target lesion was the carotid artery; however the lesion characteristics are unknown.When removed from the tray, the stent was still constrained within the outer member/sheath.The following information is unknown: if the tuohy borst (hemostasis) valve was in the open or closed position when received; if the temperature exposure indicator on the pouch was checked to confirm that the black dotted pattern with a grey background is clearly visible; the sheath introducer brand and size, the guiding catheter brand and size; if the stent delivery system (sds) pass through any acute bends; if the delivery of the sds to the lesion ipsilateral or contralateral; if any unusual force used at any time during the procedure; if the sds have to pass through a previously placed stent; if there was any difficulty advancing the sds over the guidewire or the embolic protection device; the location where the difficulty occurred.The product was returned for analysis.One non-sterile units of precise pro rx us carotid system was returned.Per visual analysis the hemovalve was returned opened.The stent was not deployed and the outer body was found separated at 21.9cm from the outer member brite tip.A kink or bent condition was found on the device at 12.8cm from the outer member brite tip.No other damages were noted.Functional analysis was not performed due to the separated condition found on the outer body of the device.Per dimensional analysis the od and id were measured adjacent to the separated condition and results were found within specification.The stroke length could not be measured due to the separated condition on the outer body.Per sem analysis of the separated section of the proximal outer member (polyamide), the distal section of the outer member shows a twisted or ripped condition that indicates elongation at the point of material rupture.Elongation is a common characteristic of pieces which were stretched or pulled until separation.There was also evidence of adhered or transferred material at the fused area found in some separated areas of polyamide.The available evidence may suggest that the catheter proximal outer member was fused to the catheter distal section at a certain time.A device history record (dhr) review of lot 17449576 revealed no anomalies or non-conformances during the manufacturing and inspection processes that can be associated with the reported event.The reported ¿stent delivery system (sds) - resistance/friction-outer sheath - in patient¿ and ¿stent delivery system (sds)-cracked - in patient¿ was confirmed through analysis of the returned device.The exact cause of the events could not be determined during analysis.Based on the information available for review, vessel characteristics (although unknown) or procedural factors may have contributed to the event as evidenced by the description of resistance, the kink noted on the device and the elongations noted on the outer surface during analysis which are associated with the application of excessive force.According to the instructions for use ¿extract the stent delivery system from the tray.Examine the device for any damage.Evaluate the distal end of the catheter to ensure that the stent is contained within the outer sheath.Do not use if the stent is partially deployed.Note: if resistance is met during delivery system introduction, the system should be withdrawn and another system should be used.Note: if any resistance is met during delivery system withdrawal, advance the outer sheath until the outer sheath marker contacts the catheter tip and withdraw the system as one unit.¿ neither the dhr review nor the product analysis suggests that the event experienced by the customer could be related to the manufacturing process; therefore, no corrective/preventive action will be taken at this time.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PRECISEPRO RX US CAROTID SYSTE
Type of Device
STENT, CAROTID
Manufacturer (Section D)
CORDIS DE MEXICO
circuito int nte 1820
juarez 32575
MX  32575
Manufacturer (Section G)
CORDIS DE MEXICO
circuito int nte 1820
juarez 32575
MX   32575
Manufacturer Contact
cecil navajas
14201 nw 60th avenue
miami lakes, FL 33014
MDR Report Key6446843
MDR Text Key71337115
Report Number9616099-2017-01009
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NIM
UDI-Device Identifier20705032036457
UDI-Public20705032036457
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P030047
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 04/06/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/30/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date02/28/2018
Device Model NumberPC0730RXC
Device Catalogue NumberPC0730RXC
Device Lot Number17449576
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer02/28/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Distributor Facility Aware Date03/15/2017
Date Manufacturer Received03/28/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured05/02/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-